The statement says that a nation's greatness is determined more by the welfare of its people than the achievements of its few
individual entities. Geniuses and great personalities are born at random places in the world. Some are born in very poor countries and some in rich ones. Where ever they are, what matters most are opportunities they are provided with to showcase their ingenuity.
We have seen people like Ramanujam, a genius mathematician and a child prodigy who made several contributions to the field with no formal education and coming from a poor family. The fact that he is remembered even today is because he was given some opportunities by chance which led him publish his works. Now, imagine the sheer number of people like him who are not given any platform to showcase their skills. The driving factors that contribute to provide such opportunities depends on various factors, one of which is a good standard of living that every nation should strive for.
I classify the people in to four types. First is the person who is talented and uses it. Second is person who is talented and does not take advantage of it. Third is the person who is not talented and tries to build it. And fourth is the person who is not talented and does not even try to inculcate it even if there are demanding circumstances. The world needs more of the third type of people. In any of the scenarios, what is more important is the avenue where the people can demonstrate their talent.
This is where general welfare of a nation comes in to picture. Welfare of the people makes sure that sufficient foundation is provided to help them make achievements of their own thereby contributing to the overall greatness of the nation.
A nation is always represented by its people not by some group of people in power. If the latter is the case the group of people should form a separate nation with just themselves boosting their own nation welfare chart.
- The general welfare of a nation's people is a better indication of that nation's greatness than are the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disag 43
- Write a response in which you discuss the extent towhich you agree or disagree with the recommendationand explain your reasoning for the position you take. Indeveloping and supporting your position, describespecific circumstances in which adopting thereco 16
- Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.Write a response in which you discuss the ext 40
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 27, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
The statement says that a nations greatness is determined more by the wel...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 125, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... people than the achievements of its few individual entities. Geniuses and great ...
^^^
Line 9, column 84, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e not by some group of people in power. If the latter is the case the group of peo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, third, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1615.0 2235.4752809 72% => OK
No of words: 341.0 442.535393258 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73607038123 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64467031876 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510263929619 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 704.065955056 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.6584452405 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.0 118.986275619 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9473684211 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.47368421053 5.21951772744 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198238816579 0.243740707755 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0633937235266 0.0831039109588 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673180359478 0.0758088955206 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128658110086 0.150359130593 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0896882777931 0.0667264976115 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 14.1392134831 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 100.480337079 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.