The general welfare of the nation's people is definitely a better indication of the nation's greatness since the achievement of its rulers, artist or scientists are all a sample of the overall people and does not give us the understanding of the nation's people.
As we know that these prizes cannot quantify the welfare of the whole nation. The nation's people are the ones who are looking for basic welfare which is a necessity for all the people such as medical, financial and economical condition. We have known that the people of the country need to sustain life with these necessities and if the people are able to give their family these necessities then one can assume that the nation's greatness.
There are instances in my own country India where is the case that the scientist and rulers are doing great in the eyes of other countries whereas the people of the country are challenged by the basic necessities such as food, shelter, and electricity. Additionally, the families who have young children are unable to find employment for there children and thus are dependent on their parents.
Thus such an instance prove to show the opposite of that few people doing great for the nation cannot justify the whole nation for its greatness. The greatness of the people can be measured by the people and for the people.
- The general welfare of a nation's people is a better indication of that nation's greatness than are the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disag 33
- The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of a company that builds shopping malls around the country."The surface of a section of Route 101, paved just two years ago by Good Intentions Roadways, is now badly cracked 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 84, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...s definitely a better indication of the nations greatness since the achievement of its ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...understanding of the nations people. As we know that these prizes cannot quanti...
^^
Line 3, column 422, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...ecessities then one can assume that the nations greatness. There are instances in my...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 196, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...le of the country are challenged by the basic necessities such as food, shelter, and electricity....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...s are dependent on their parents. Thus such an instance prove to show the oppo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, then, thus, whereas, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 58.6224719101 39% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1104.0 2235.4752809 49% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 228.0 442.535393258 52% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84210526316 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 4.55969084622 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56069745135 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 215.323595506 52% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491228070175 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 346.5 704.065955056 49% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 20.2370786517 40% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.5014312821 60.3974514979 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.0 118.986275619 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5 23.4991977007 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.21951772744 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236842317935 0.243740707755 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113954269431 0.0831039109588 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0926959154802 0.0758088955206 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164351374219 0.150359130593 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105987085152 0.0667264976115 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 100.480337079 47% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.