There are copious countries around the world and all countries want to see their countries great. However, since the approaches for evaluating the greatness of countries is not defined, there is fervor debate while taking the criteria during the examination. The prompt argues that eminence of a nation is assessed by a content of the citizen, rather than scientific achievement, or popularity of the ruler. However, I disagree with the prompt. Commonly people take stance of countries based on achievement, and any achievement by luminary or leader can also enhance well-being of a citizen. It is true that quality of life of citizen is a strong indicator, but its greatness should not be hinged on welfare solely. a approach should be taken while evaluating greatness of the nation.
The superficial view of the people, regarding other nation, is based on the country achievement, leader popularity, or artist imminence. For instance, I, living in an Asian country, am cognizant about the European countries or American countries (South America and North America) through their worldwide known contribution and, also these aspects will shape us our view regarding the nation. I am aware of France by the contribution of Napoleon, or about Brazil through the success of Pele. This approach of the analysis is used, by a majority of people, to judge the nation greatness while only a few take a comprehensive approach.
The ultimate goal of achievement by a nation is to provide prosperity to the people. Any-break thought in science and technology will elevate people living status. For instance, any development of health research will aids citizen to cope with prevalent epidemics or disease. The success of artist will make people to vaunt about their country achievement, and also encourage citizen to take part in artistic performance, which ultimately provides good reputation for the country. Furthermore, any policies of a successful leader are related to people welfare, even though it may seem nocuous to people at first sight.
Finally, only depending on people welfare can obscure other parameter that should be taken into account for claiming a great nation. For instance, in Bhutan, there is happiness minister that deals with the gaiety of citizen. So, can we call it a great nation? It is not because even though it have high quality of life index, it lacks various parameter such as infrastructure development, low literacy rate and low military defense. Any minor offense can turn can bring upheaval in the country. It is largely influenced by its neighboring country India; thus, it is pertinent to take various factors, when it comes to deciding sovereignty of nation.
In conclusion, due to above-mentioned reasons; it is imprudent to take only single factor- the welfare of people- while assessing greatness of the nation. Therefore, various accounts should be taken while discussing greatness of the nation.
- TPO-44 - Independent Writing Task Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time doing th 70
- Some people say that teaching local history to school children is more important than teaching world history to them. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- TPO-47 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 76
- TPO-45 - Integrated Writing Task Any student of paleontology will be struck by the fact that a great many animals of the past were considerably larger than they are today. This holds true for species ranging from dinosaurs to most mammals. Just why they w 78
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the m 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 718, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: A
...hould not be hinged on welfare solely. a approach should be taken while evaluat...
^
Line 1, column 718, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...hould not be hinged on welfare solely. a approach should be taken while evaluat...
^
Line 1, column 719, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ould not be hinged on welfare solely. a approach should be taken while evaluatin...
^^
Line 3, column 597, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun take seems to be countable; consider using: 'few takes'.
Suggestion: few takes
...judge the nation greatness while only a few take a comprehensive approach. The ultima...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 219, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'aid'
Suggestion: aid
...any development of health research will aids citizen to cope with prevalent epidemic...
^^^^
Line 7, column 294, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
...ation? It is not because even though it have high quality of life index, it lacks va...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2473.0 2235.4752809 111% => OK
No of words: 471.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25053078556 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65859790218 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88593064815 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507430997877 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 783.9 704.065955056 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.177583945 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.041666667 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.625 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.29166666667 5.21951772744 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179786093486 0.243740707755 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591396530065 0.0831039109588 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412747445128 0.0758088955206 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110486783041 0.150359130593 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313976165476 0.0667264976115 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 100.480337079 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.