TPO-02 - Integrated Writing Task In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people

In the passage, the benefits of team working in the project have been illustrated whereas the lecture is in contrast to merits of team work casting doubts at its efficiency. In the passage, it is said that with the use of different knowledge, skills and expertises of members in the newly formed team, the project will be successful. Instead, from the research made after six months of assigning team in the project, various drawbacks have been revealed out.

First, in the team, there were some of the members who had not contributed a bit but were given free ride as the contributors. This must have been discouraging to those who put their hearts and brains into the project.

Second, it is intricate to get recognition for the work you have done in the team. If the project is successful, the team will be exalted. However, the contributors are dragged behind and are overshadowed with the name of the team. No name was named in the project too which obviously made contributors distraught.

Third, it is complicated to run the project successfully as to get consensus among all the members is hard to achieve. After a series of meeting also, no considerable agreement could come into the floor. Thus, it is never a time saving decision. This can cause failure no any project. In the same way, if there are some influential people in the team, then right decision for the project is difficult to implement. Without any further ado, some of the members will easily agree with what the influencer say. Therefore, most of the time, decision is taken to the direction that does not work at all. Even the failure of the project is named under all of the team members.

Finally, it can be concluded that none of work can be accountable to an individual if the team is assigned. It is a risk prone decision where cooperation and understanding among the members is not easily obtainable. So, before assigning any team, proper research has to be done to get a substantial difference.

Votes
Average: 7.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 32, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... out. First, in the team, there were some of the members who had not contributed a bit b...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 270, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...saving decision. This can cause failure no any project. In the same way, if there ...
^^
Line 7, column 441, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... to implement. Without any further ado, some of the members will easily agree with what the...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 647, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...e failure of the project is named under all of the team members. Finally, it can be co...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, second, so, then, therefore, third, thus, whereas, as to, in contrast, in contrast to, in the same way

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 10.4613686534 258% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 30.3222958057 171% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1646.0 1373.03311258 120% => OK
No of words: 345.0 270.72406181 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77101449275 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75304341723 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 145.348785872 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510144927536 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 512.1 419.366225166 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 2.5761589404 311% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.6628504438 49.2860985944 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.3 110.228320801 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.25 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1 7.06452816374 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372837378768 0.272083759551 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108454074948 0.0996497079465 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589350956045 0.0662205650399 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203282769471 0.162205337803 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498446541086 0.0443174109184 112% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.3589403974 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.09 12.2367328918 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.

Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.