Genius is nothing more than another term for obsession.
Two words cannot ever mean exactly the same that is why even synonyms have limitations – the way you use one word will differ from the way you use its synonym. When someone is said to be a genius, it mostly means the person did something out of the ordinary that causes people to hail him or her whilst obsession is the state of devoting time and energy in something to the extreme. Even though these words do not seem to be synonyms, when thought of it in actual sense, they can be likened. I agree to the assertion to some extent.
First of all, it is evident by what we see and hear that geniuses spend awfully long hours to accomplish what they are hailed for. Judging from this, you can conclude and maintain that it is a sign of obsession. Einstein is a well-known scientist who invented the light bulb. History has it that he tried several number of times to achieve that. When something is being done for the first time, it mostly requires a lot of time. Compare studying something that has already been established like a theory and creating a light bulb that never existed; the two cannot be the same. It means that spending time on one thing and being totally devoted to it makes it somewhat an obsession.
Also, ingenuity becomes an obsession when the person is motivated to do what he or she does. That way spending more time to accomplish a task feels easy as compared to someone who gets none. Aside motivation, another thing that causes obsession to link to ingenuity is sponsorship. Knowing that there is somebody looking up to you makes geniuses obsessed. It cannot be refuted that great results and inventions come out of the obsessions of geniuses
However, when ingenuity is not viewed as an obsession, it is mostly in instances where the genius in question has a flair in what he does. Consider Leonardo da Vinci for instance, he was a genius in Arts, Mechanical Engineering, Science and Physics. History has it that he used to work for a King to design equipment to be used by the King’s kingdom – he did not spend so much time doing Arts but his prowess in Arts is undeniable. His name still remains because of his exceptionality; excelling in more than one field. This is a lucid and cogent idea to disagree to the assertion.
- Question authority Only by accepted wisdom can we advance our understanding of the world 64
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the owner of the Juniper Café, a small, local coffee shop in the downtown area of a small American city:“We must reduce overhead here at the café. Instead of opening at 6 a.m. weekdays, we will now open at 8 50
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and su 50
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and su 50
- “Scientific theories, which most people consider as ‘fact,’ almost invariably prove to be inaccurate. Thus, one should look upon any information described as ‘factual’ with skepticism since it may well be proven false in the future.”Write an e 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 305, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun number seems to be countable; consider using: 'several numbers'.
Suggestion: several numbers
...ight bulb. History has it that he tried several number of times to achieve that. When somethin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 450, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s come out of the obsessions of geniuses However, when ingenuity is not viewed as...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, so, still, well, another thing, for instance, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.3162921348 194% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 33.0505617978 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1857.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 408.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.55147058824 5.05705443957 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52904005287 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536764705882 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9994951899 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.85 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.21951772744 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152777952761 0.243740707755 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0419645293362 0.0831039109588 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0400714162686 0.0758088955206 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0924699859112 0.150359130593 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0485872003776 0.0667264976115 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 14.1392134831 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 48.8420337079 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.11 12.1639044944 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.