"Government should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development."
Researches are stepping stones towards determining the growth and development rate of any nation. In this globalized economy, no country can't stay in isolation, thus to meet the emerging changes timely researches are conducted by authorized committees so that the government, indirectly the citizens of country, can take benefit from new growth and development patterns.
Government is potent factor in initiating, finalizing the concept, budgeting any new research program. But the government should try to restrain itself from interfering into the ongoing functioning, since the personnel who have been recruited for a particular project are indeed specialists of that core area and understand the pros and cons of situation pretty well. At times, the government official having minimal or even no knowledge about the process questions the researchers, this somehow creates a complex situation as in a way they are doubting towards the perfectionism or loyalty of those scientists; this in a way causes a blow to their self-esteem and thus they start losing their interest in the project.
Also, government being the ruling hand, as it is giving financial aid to such programs, sometimes cut down the budget or intervene in their expense related matters, this slow down the pace of the work and leads to mere wastage of time and money. Thus, government needs to restrict itself from intervening into these ventures as this will create only chaos in the work environment.
On the other hand, in absence of any government check, the national security of any country is at stake since the researchers or scientists can misuse the technology or scientific coding for their personal monetary benefits. In such a case, role of government becomes more crucial as it has to work as a "watch-dog" to keep an eye on every functioning inside the four walls of laboratories.
Also the funding for such programs is done by using the taxes- that are further a part of hard earned money of citizens. In a way, the government has to be answerable for spending every penny to native of its state. The government needs to appoint certain educated and trained professionals as subordinates or team-mates in such ventures so as to assess the functioning of every movement.
I firmly believe that keeping a minimal check is of utmost importance, since when the question is regarding national security government can't ignore its role. Essential surveillance teams must be formulated that doesn't intervene in the functioning of research programs but monitor all the actions in a positive manner.
- The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of Quiot Manufacturing.During the past year, Quiot Manufacturing had 30 percent more on-the-job accidents than at the nearby Panoply Industries plant, where the work shifts are one hour shorter than o 73
- The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries. 50
- "The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries." 66
- "Schools should be required to teach the essential interconnectedness of all human beings and thus help eliminate wars, cultural clashes, and other forms of conflict." 50
- imagination is more important than knowledge 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 138, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... In this globalized economy, no country cant stay in isolation, thus to meet the eme...
^^^^
Line 3, column 542, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...es a complex situation as in a way they are doubting towards the perfectionism or loyalty of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 302, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...comes more crucial as it has to work as a 'watch-dog' to keep an eye on...
^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...inside the four walls of laboratories. Also the funding for such programs is done b...
^^^^
Line 6, column 338, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...rdinates or team-mates in such ventures so as to assess the functioning of every movemen...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 138, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... regarding national security government cant ignore its role. Essential surveillance...
^^^^
Line 7, column 212, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...veillance teams must be formulated that doesnt intervene in the functioning of researc...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 297, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive manner" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ch programs but monitor all the actions in a positive manner.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, regarding, so, thus, well, as to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 12.9106741573 170% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2175.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 417.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21582733813 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03117695717 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 215.323595506 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565947242206 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 676.8 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.4162314969 60.3974514979 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.357142857 118.986275619 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.7857142857 23.4991977007 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 5.21951772744 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121195665407 0.243740707755 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.043479543887 0.0831039109588 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0251104326388 0.0758088955206 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0595154802649 0.150359130593 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0164792209285 0.0667264976115 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 14.1392134831 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 48.8420337079 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.59 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.38706741573 116% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 100.480337079 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.