Government should reduce purely scientific endeavours like space exploration to get more funds towards humanitarian projects
Government should reduce purely scientific endeavours like space exploration to get more funds towards humanitarian projects and focus on providing the basic necessities for its citizens.
Throughout history, space technology has changed the way everyday things work from using paper maps to using GPS to get directions for a destination. Millions of dollars were used to get here but also think about the money that was lost when the project didn’t succeed. Out of 10 projects, at the least if one project costs 1 million dollars for the government, considering the very low success rate of 10% the 9 million dollars spent was of no impact.
Since the major duty of a government is to ensure that it fulfils the basic needs of its people like food, shelter, clothing, electricity, etc they should have used the money that otherwise went in the failed science experiments. In the limited funds that the government has, once we cut the funds from space endeavours, the room for humanitarian funds automatically burgeon. People are still fighting for their basic rights worldwide undergoing starvation, homelessness, lack of medical amenities and much more. Government funds can alleviate the sufferings of such people in real time by building homes, providing food, medical assistance in the affected areas.
The amount of funds raised for space projects are higher than for humanitarian projects. They are so lost in the idea of invention and discovery that they lost sight of the whole experience which is helping the man on the ground. Did space exploration solve the water crisis or open new avenues for curing diseases? No, so let’s use that money and put it under humanitarian projects and help fight these social issues.
In conclusion, if the government decreases the funds allotted to space exploration, it opens new avenues to tackle the global social issues. We can witness increased research, development in humanitarian projects and accomplish the main task of providing basic rights to the citizens.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-17 | hema.j.21gowda | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 153, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...ian projects and focus on providing the basic necessities for its citizens. Throughout history...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al assistance in the affected areas. The amount of funds raised for space pro...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1709.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 326.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24233128834 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82464707733 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579754601227 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 704.065955056 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2274448903 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.071428571 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2857142857 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.78571428571 5.21951772744 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.383472975024 0.243740707755 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127071339554 0.0831039109588 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.172632868321 0.0758088955206 228% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252592989146 0.150359130593 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.236960862353 0.0667264976115 355% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.