Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.
Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated.
Even if major cities do not contribute significantly to the gross domestic product, their share per capita remains the highest. As the metropolis expands with more families migrating from various regions, it also demands the development of the existing infrastructure to satisfy the needs of the city- construction of new roads, maintenance of sewage systems, upgradation of water pipelines, and multiple other mundane tasks.
All these initiatives cannot be executed without the financial support of the government, simply because not enough citizens would ever pitch in. Furthermore, the state should allocate resources judiciously to facilitate growth of the nation.
The residential population soon transforms into a diverse group of individuals from across the world and starts to lose its traditions. Townships become hubs of cultural fauna where people for once, forget about their ancestry and cherish the present.
While the rural areas expand vertically, the traditions that historically set communities apart are still being preserved by the small towns and districts where the folks continue to use unheard lingo. In summary I disagree with the reason to the given claim.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, still, while, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 19.5258426966 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 33.0505617978 21% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 58.6224719101 44% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1015.0 2235.4752809 45% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 180.0 442.535393258 41% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63888888889 5.05705443957 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 4.55969084622 80% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89091275261 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 215.323595506 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.777777777778 0.4932671777 158% => OK
syllable_count: 312.3 704.065955056 44% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 20.2370786517 40% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.6366110396 60.3974514979 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.875 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.21951772744 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157751407334 0.243740707755 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0518422633304 0.0831039109588 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0312029382069 0.0758088955206 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0707927903631 0.150359130593 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0291696253565 0.0667264976115 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 14.1392134831 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 12.1639044944 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.78 8.38706741573 129% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 100.480337079 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.