Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.

It is true that one cannot ignore current problems and plan to solve future predicted issues. However, just working on solution of on going issues is not enough, one has to be prepared to overcome problemes that are anticipated in future. For example, problems like climet change, energy and population increse has to be planed to be solved from right now.
The government should be far sighted. It is neccessary to predict the major issues the world will be subjected to and we have to start finding solution of these problems righ now. For example, climet change is a major issue the world is going to face after one or two decades. To alliviate this problem, scienists have to start finding causes of climet change. The government can work on developing technology which discharges less carbon dioxide in atmosphere.
In five to ten years from now, it is possible that price of crude oil will be sky rocketing. To travel on petro or diesel car would not be economical. The govern ment should not ignore this issue and just focusing on recent issue is not fair. We have to find alternate energy source of energy. Scientists have found solar penals to convert solar energy into electricity. It is not fair to just provide funding to helth and eduction but research and development should also be given priority.
It is neccessary to focus on anticipated issue but these anticipated issues should be higly probable. It is not a clever idea of funding redundent research such as to live on marce or moon.In sum, it is not fair to just focus on immediate problems but focus should also be given to solve anticipated issues.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 132, Rule ID: ON_GOING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ongoing'?
Suggestion: ongoing
...s. However, just working on solution of on going issues is not enough, one has to be pre...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 229, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...overcome problemes that are anticipated in future. For example, problems like climet chan...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...be planed to be solved from right now. The government should be far sighted. It...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ges less carbon dioxide in atmosphere. In five to ten years from now, it is pos...
^^
Line 3, column 153, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... or diesel car would not be economical. The govern ment should not ignore this issue and j...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 103, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ipated issues should be higly probable. It is not a clever idea of funding redunde...
^^
Line 4, column 190, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...search such as to live on marce or moon.In sum, it is not fair to just focus on im...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, as to, for example, such as, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1343.0 2235.4752809 60% => OK
No of words: 282.0 442.535393258 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76241134752 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55166670387 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 215.323595506 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514184397163 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 704.065955056 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.3100158198 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.9375 118.986275619 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.625 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.9375 5.21951772744 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254308171406 0.243740707755 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0827363667775 0.0831039109588 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.078758058921 0.0758088955206 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175034788787 0.150359130593 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0968205890411 0.0667264976115 145% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 14.1392134831 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.03 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 100.480337079 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.