Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The author claims that the government should fix the problems that would immediate affect people rather than thinking a bigger picture of preparing to solve what could be happened in the future. Thus, I can not fully agree what the author try to claim. To be more conscious, the government should thinking bigger than the citizen under his/her govern, then, a healthy, robust, safety country could last long.
When it comes to an immediate problem, we kinda put it as something will harm our lives, such as earthquake in the mountain, a hurricane came from the ocean, and a house fire needed to be fixed. Certainly, these problems are quite danger and what could be the end, may tribute thousands of lives taking away, thus, the government's priority is to solving it, an immediate problems, to protect the people on the land, protect people out of the danger, serving enough food, clothes to keep people alive. Yet, the author claims these things above, which happended of today should the government focused on, rather than other potential danger, problems. To justify the claim, we should think back through the central of the problem. For example, a house fire incident happened could be the reason that the government didn't pay much attention on educating children away from fire, or teach people how to manage their old technology wire. Thus, if the government from the education curriculum every week, it could cut the times of incidents.
Another clear vision is about the country safety issue. Though there are less fight, war in democracy countries, our government still need to prepare army resources, such as training war strategies, gun use, or any such professional issues. Otherwise, when a nuclear bomb, or an aircraft, a ship full of enemies coming through our country to take power on our land, then we will not have enough techniques to fight back, and defend for ourselves. A government's duty, not only fix the problems happened today, but also need to prepare what could be anticipated.
For these reasons above, if the government only focused on what happened now, it might cause a great lost of our country, such as democracy, human rights, powerful weapons, etc. A responsible government that the people count on with trust should do both things when governing. It's clear that the damage of earthquake, house fire, hurricane is big issue and need public resourse to solve, also, the war preperation, and human rights protection are also the central problems that the government should worried about and take actual action on it. Thus, I can not fully agree what the author claimed.
To be a government that people could rely on, the government sould be well prepared for anything happened or yet happened.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-21 | Bonjourkmm | 45 | view |
- A fossil skeleton of a dinosaur called Sinosauropteryx, preserved in volcanic ash, was discovered in Liaoning, China, in 1996. Interestingly, the fossil included a pattern of fine lines surrounding the skeletal bones. Some paleontologists interpret the li 88
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear. 50
- Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and resist unjust laws.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure 58
- money 90
- TPO 52 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 410, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...robust, safety country could last long. When it comes to an immediate problem, w...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 320, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...ousands of lives taking away, thus, the governments priority is to solving it, an immediate...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 372, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'problem'?
Suggestion: problem
...priority is to solving it, an immediate problems, to protect the people on the land, pro...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 813, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...could be the reason that the government didnt pay much attention on educating childre...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1036, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...k, it could cut the times of incidents. Another clear vision is about the countr...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 450, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...fight back, and defend for ourselves. A governments duty, not only fix the problems happene...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 562, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d to prepare what could be anticipated. For these reasons above, if the governme...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 598, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ot fully agree what the author claimed. To be a government that people could rel...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, still, then, thus, well, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.4196629213 185% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2294.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 458.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00873362445 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50146026268 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 215.323595506 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526200873362 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 677.7 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 13.0 4.99550561798 260% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.2085297832 60.3974514979 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.444444444 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4444444444 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.83333333333 5.21951772744 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 5.13820224719 253% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196904231877 0.243740707755 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.068491726026 0.0831039109588 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0587772059215 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111294339246 0.150359130593 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0607595104937 0.0667264976115 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.