Governing has been one of the most important aspects for communities since the beginning of the evolution. Solving each kind of problems helps the community to be sustained in the future. The prompt suggests that the leaders of the communities should focus on short-term problems instead of long-term problems. I mostly disagree with the idea of prioritizing immediate problems. I will explore the reasons in the following essay.
There are some people who argue that the government should give more importance to the immediate problems by stating that members of the communities would be happier if their immediate requirements are satisfied. For instance, if the residents of a particular area located in the country need an additional hospital, the government should spend its effort to construct this additional building instead of focusing on the health system. In short, opposing side suggests that immediate solutions would make the residents more satisfied.
However, the government should form required healthcare systems before thinking about medical supply. Although the residents have immediate demand about the medical supply, these immediate demands should be regulated with the well-designed healthcare system. For instance, the government should have well-skilled labours and doctors to treat patients, which requires a strong education system. In other words, skilled doctors and healthcare labours require long-term education. As a result, the leader of the communities should design long-term vision to solve permanent problems that will occur in the future instead of just focusing on the relation of current supply and current demand.
In contrast to the opposing argument, long-term structures are the most vital elements of sustainable economies. Capitalists economies fetch investors by forming a sustainable system which will not cause problems in the future. For example, if a government designs its laws and legal institutions as promising equal rights to its residents, it would create constant demand in the long-term. As a result, it will decrease the inflation rates in the long term, and more investors will be interested in investing in the country. However, if the government is only focused on building new courts, which is required in the short-term, there will be permanent problems in the legal institution in the future. Hence, future problems are more valuable than short-term ones.
In conclusion, although there are some opposing arguments, the leaders should focus on problems of the future since they will result in permanent damages. The idea of considering only immediate problems is completely flawed since even immediate problems require long-term vision.
- The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers artists or scientists but by the general welfare of its people 58
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 66
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 94
- People s behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting 16
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts Write a response in which you 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, in short, kind of, as a result, in contrast to, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2299.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 411.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59367396594 5.05705443957 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87059669044 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.476885644769 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 696.6 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.1619998681 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.476190476 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5714285714 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.21951772744 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223980056195 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0755069811543 0.0831039109588 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052151967955 0.0758088955206 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141954902014 0.150359130593 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0233114518102 0.0667264976115 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.1639044944 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 100.480337079 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.