Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
There are two types of problems which should be solved by government. One is which required immediate attentions and other one is that there should be possibilities that may happen in future. However, if government focuses on solving immediate problems then it is beneficial to society rather than solving problems which may or may not anticipate in future.
There are many immediate problems which may require solving as soon as possible. If immediate problems are solve first then they might help to reduce other problems which may occur in future. But if we don't solve problems which required immediate attention then these problems may increase which in future gets more complicated. For example, Poverty, unemployment, better education, security etc. are immediate problems. If we do not give more attention to these problems then situation get worse and more serious problems increase. Thus, immediate problems should be first priority of government.
There are some problems which should be solved before it anticipated. Government should make a plan to face problems which may or may not occur but government should have to be prepared. For example, government has to ready for cyclone which may destroy many parts of city. If they do not make any plan to rescue people which may trapped in cyclone then people will have to suffer. Thus, sometimes government has to make plans to solve problems otherwise people will have to suffer.
However, government should make a priority list of immediate problems as well as problems which may occur in future. Government's work is to solve problems of people of their city. Solving future problems while ignoring immediate will work against government. For example, treatment of dangerous disease is more important factor for government than ceremony of a bridge. If more people are suffering from disease then government should solve this problem immediately. If they don’t take much attention to this problem then people will die. So, government should know what are their primary goals.
In conclusion, there are some problems which required immediate attention and some problems which may or may not occurs in future but very serious problems then government should also make plans to solve them if they occur.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | jason123 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | Himanshu Sharma | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-30 | PFF TAHSAN | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-26 | tg763622253 | 58 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | sudesh tiwari | 58 | view |
- Some people suggest that it is wrong to give money to beggars asking for money on the street, while others think that it is the right thing to do. Which point of view do you think is correct, and why? 60
- The following is a letter that recently appeared in the Oak City Gazette, a local newspaper."The primary function of the Committee for a Better Oak City is to advise the city government on how to make the best use of the city's limited budget. However, at 77
- If a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it are justifiable. 50
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future. 50
- In Any Situation, Progress Requires Discussion Among People Who Have Contrasting Points Of View. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 182, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...should be possibilities that may happen in future. However, if government focuses on solv...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 348, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...roblems which may or may not anticipate in future. There are many immediate problems ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 83, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ay require solving as soon as possible. If immediate problems are solve first then...
^^
Line 3, column 109, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'solved'.
Suggestion: solved
... as possible. If immediate problems are solve first then they might help to reduce ot...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 183, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...o reduce other problems which may occur in future. But if we dont solve problems which re...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 204, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ms which may occur in future. But if we dont solve problems which required immediate...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hould be first priority of government. There are some problems which sh...
^^^
Line 5, column 283, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e which may destroy many parts of city. If they do not make any plan to rescue peo...
^^
Line 7, column 108, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ems as well as problems which may occur in future. Governments work is to solve problems ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, then, thus, well, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 28.0 12.4196629213 225% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1922.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 364.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28021978022 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63556486346 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 215.323595506 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.384615384615 0.4932671777 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 594.0 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 6.24550561798 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.1679366908 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.5652173913 118.986275619 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8260869565 23.4991977007 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.78260869565 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 18.0 5.13820224719 350% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.471030911122 0.243740707755 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.193766700068 0.0831039109588 233% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127170783176 0.0758088955206 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.342819038569 0.150359130593 228% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0993859367483 0.0667264976115 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 48.8420337079 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.72 8.38706741573 80% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 100.480337079 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.