It has always been a controversial topic when discussing if a government should focus on solving the immediate problems of today or focus on solving the anticipated problems of the future. While it is true that what you can do tomorrow can get done today, that thinking may be flawed. I believe that if government leaders are too focused on future problems, it may distract them from more immediate issues.
Firstly, immediate issues that are presented to a government creates more urgency than any potential problem of the future. People within a nation will not be pleased with its government if they are ignoring these issues trying to solve potential issues. Issues such as poverty, education, and unemployment are all problems that, if not acted on immediately, will become a larger problem in the future. If poverty continues to increase, the government may be then faced with malnutrition and health care issues, homelessness, and decrease in population. Ignoring education will lead to lack of literacy and a lack of employees to fill certain jobs.
One example of a government ignoring an immediate issue would be the United States current issue on gun control. Due to many school shootings in the past year, citizens are demanding action from the government to take action, whether it is to create more laws that prevent certain people from obtaining guns or to completely ban guns and take them away from civilians. Though many demands from U.S. citizens have been voiced, the government has only banned bump stocks and that's it on that subject. Since then, the government has been focused on other matters, such as the Russian investigation.
In conclusion, a government ignoring the issues of today for potential issues of tomorrow will lead to greater issues arising. Although some of these future issues are known to us and are to be a great threat when the time comes, ignoring current issues will lead to more problems and the citizens of the nation will lose trust in their government.
- Claim: Imagination is a more valuable asset than experience.Reason: People who lack experience are free to imagine what is possible without the constraints of established habits and attitudes. 50
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 50
- People should undertake risky action only after they have carefully considered its consequences. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 50
- The most effective way to understand contemporary culture is to analyze the trends of its youth.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In dev 66
- To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to addre 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 650, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lack of employees to fill certain jobs. One example of a government ignoring an ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 474, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...ernment has only banned bump stocks and thats it on that subject. Since then, the gov...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, so, then, while, in conclusion, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1674.0 2235.4752809 75% => OK
No of words: 335.0 442.535393258 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99701492537 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70254617863 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513432835821 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 704.065955056 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3795895468 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.571428571 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9285714286 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 5.21951772744 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222834834862 0.243740707755 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0876653360003 0.0831039109588 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105254988685 0.0758088955206 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149353844586 0.150359130593 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115847364007 0.0667264976115 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 100.480337079 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.