Governments should invest as much in the arts as they do in the military.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Military is one of the important driving factor of the country; having the military powers keeps public safe. That is why today every country is looking to enhance their military powers as much as they can. Having a good military power ensures people that they are living in a safe environment.
While it is true that investing in military is important, but it is also true that government should invest in other fields such as arts too. Some people are very artistic but due to lack of funds they are not able to showcase their skills. If the government increase the funding in arts field, lot of people will be able to persue their dreams. So government should increase their fundings in arts.
It may be a good idea to invest in arts but investing same amount as in military may be a little extreme. Government funding comes from the people's taxes. Increasing the funding of arts will lead to increase in taxes. People might not be able to pay the taxes. So increasing a little funding in arts is a good idea rather than increasing the same as military.
Military field is one of the biggest investment that the government does. If the government starts investing same amount of money in arts, they might have to reduce their fundings in other fields or say worst- in military field to meet the funding of arts. Reducing the investment may weaken the economy. People might face hardships due to the lack of investment in other fields. So government should take these factors into account before investment.
So it is clear that the idea presented in the given statement is not the best idea to implement. Government should consider various possible factors before implementing such extreme scheme. It is good to invest in arts but not the same as the military.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-16 | sydneyness | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-10 | sakshi111 | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-07 | Opak Pulu | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-21 | S M Naimul Mamun | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-20 | kanyapr | 66 | view |
- A recent study indicates that children living in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal have lower levels of tooth decay than children living in suburban areas in the United States, despite the fact that people in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal re 50
- Governments should invest as much in the arts as they do in the military.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and suppor 50
- Governments should spend more money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Government should spend more money on railways than roads. to what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 56
- the best way for society to prepare its youth for leadership in government ,industry,any other field is by instilling them a sense of cooperation rather than competition. write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 101, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t it is also true that government should invest in other fields such as arts too....
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, so, while, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1478.0 2235.4752809 66% => OK
No of words: 309.0 442.535393258 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78317152104 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48191160454 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 215.323595506 60% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.417475728155 0.4932671777 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 454.5 704.065955056 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.9764688831 60.3974514979 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 73.9 118.986275619 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.45 23.4991977007 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8 5.21951772744 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122805528077 0.243740707755 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0481654752133 0.0831039109588 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.033791367084 0.0758088955206 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0767591226667 0.150359130593 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254349326052 0.0667264976115 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 14.1392134831 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 48.8420337079 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 12.1743820225 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.63 8.38706741573 79% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 100.480337079 44% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.