Whether the government should provide free education to those who cannot afford it may be a controversial issue. However, I think education should be a basic right, and one cannot give up exercising it. The government should definitely provide help to poor students, even if they can't afford it.
First of all, I believe that students are the basis for the development of any nation. If we invest in his education, we never know what he will become tomorrow. He can be a scientist who sends satellites into space, or an athlete who brings gold medals to the country. For example, the late Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam, known as the missile man of India, was a poor child. He is the son of a mediocre fisherman. During that time, there was no such plan as free education. Nevertheless, he worked hard and eventually became the President of India. Dr. Kalam is not the only one who is so precocious. In fact, many people just lack money. If there is a plan to provide free education, such smart talents can easily be found and used to benefit the country.
Secondly, education in any form will shape students' early thoughts. The child's heart is too obedient. It is as good as its architect. If you fall into the wrong hands, it may lead to shocking consequences. Terrorism is the same result. Every year thousands of innocent people are trained to kill, fight and commit all immoral acts. Those who sign up for these activities cannot be blamed. Unfortunately and poor, they cannot acquire any secular knowledge. Due to the lack of formal education, there is no innate conscience that we can cultivate in them. Whether it was the terrible attack on Mumbai on 26/11 or the heinous attack on the World Trade Center, it was ultimately attributed to the lack of education.
Third, from the overall perspective, it can be inferred that illiteracy is the root cause of all problems. If it is not resources, the problem is a lot of things in the world. Today, for example, a country is faced with the problem of reducing its natural resources. This is caused by the population explosion. In addition, the main reason for the population explosion may be related to illiteracy. A survey conducted in India in 2011 showed that 30% of the population had children only to support their families by engaging in manual labor. Imagine that if formal free education becomes mandatory, it will have a huge impact on people's narrow mindedness. It should be pointed out here that the government can use this policy as a panacea to solve all potential problems.
Although such a policy may look good on paper at the beginning, it is actually difficult to implement it, but it is a priority for greater interests. In a word, in my opinion, the most powerful tool (if any) in the world is by no means knowledge. For greater benefits, the government must provide free education.
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this time period most of the complain 58
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 66
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Whether the government should provide free educ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 281, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ide help to poor students, even if they cant afford it. First of all, I belie...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, third, for example, i think, in addition, in fact, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2372.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 499.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75350701403 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72634191566 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70116641747 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 266.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533066132265 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 744.3 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 6.24550561798 256% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 34.0 20.2370786517 168% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 23.0359550562 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.8617872129 60.3974514979 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 69.7647058824 118.986275619 59% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 14.6764705882 23.4991977007 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.70588235294 5.21951772744 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 5.13820224719 253% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19600873181 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0438579168609 0.0831039109588 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662108762405 0.0758088955206 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116590113351 0.150359130593 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0806707180685 0.0667264976115 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.3 14.1392134831 59% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 48.8420337079 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 12.1743820225 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.68 12.1639044944 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 100.480337079 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.2143820225 68% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.