Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.
In my opinion, the government should offer free education to students who get admission to a college but cannot pay the fees.
Making education free for those who are admission to a university ensures that the deserving students get an opportunity to educate themselves. Such students are truly meritorious but do not have the financial ability to pay for exorbitant fees. They have to give up on their dreams and settle for a meager job. That is why providing free education for deserving students is necessary.
By allowing such talented but poor students to get education, the university enhances the probability to give rise to distinguished alumni. This, in turn, has a positive effect on their reputation. There are endless stories of personalities who began from nothing but ultimately became successful. It is the diligent, hard-working students from humble backgrounds who are quite successful and so, financial support in form of tuition waiver must be considered.
Another factor that must be taken into consideration is the phenomenon of 'brain drain'. The deserving students may decide to go abroad where education is more affordable. For example, many universities in Germany offer education without charging a penny in tuition fees. Therefore, the students may decide to study in such countries, settle there and contribute to the economy of that country. The home country is losing valuable resources: skilled professionals.
However, it is quite possible that such a scheme may lead to corruption. The students who can actually afford the education, may also want to avail this scholarship. In such cases, they may go to any extent to ensure this happen. Care must be taken that such individuals are not allowed the scholarship.
In spite of a few drawbacks, this scheme is important and quite necessary too. Therefore, I believe that the government should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-22 | KarinaShine | 75 | view |
| 2019-12-30 | Sumaiya Mila | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | stevewang1007 | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-03 | Moustafa Noufale | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-03 | Moustafa Noufale | 66 | view |
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities. 50
- A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual's levels of stimulation. The study showed that in stimulating situations (such as an encounter with an unfamiliar monkey), firstborn infant monkeys 50
- Over the past two years, the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically. Many Central Plaza store owners believe that the decrease in their business is due to the numbe 33
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. 50
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 33, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...ees. Making education free for those who are admission to a university ensures that ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, may, so, therefore, for example, in my opinion, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1687.0 2235.4752809 75% => OK
No of words: 322.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23913043478 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9765699641 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 215.323595506 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512422360248 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.9795012091 60.3974514979 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.35 118.986275619 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1 23.4991977007 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45 5.21951772744 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.462708005416 0.243740707755 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126040701817 0.0831039109588 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.20574445175 0.0758088955206 271% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.273624359839 0.150359130593 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.20531189071 0.0667264976115 308% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 14.1392134831 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.