Should national authorities offer a free charge for higher educational level to any of those who pass the schools’ admissions but being unable to afford the tuition? Some believe that governments should supply full financial aid, whilst others would argue the full financial support from government is necessary but not for every admitted candidates with inability to afford tuition. After weighting the evidences, I find the latter viewpoint more convincing as the difference in national status of each country and the inefficiency of the policy as former viewpoint if applied.
The status in economic, politics, health care, social demand is far different from each country resulting in the practice of full financial aid from governments for higher education seems unreasonable for some countries, especially undeveloped nations and territories. The profound population, more than 1.3 billion people, is a problematic issue to hinder China to pursue the dream of free tertiary education. China would have to trade-off the miracle economic boom or highly scientific breaking-through and the budget balance into multi fields, which now might gain higher priority than education for China. Like China, Zimbabwe could not follow the free tertiary education because the fact that Zimbabwe now confronts with starving and low GDP, below 1 USD. Therefore, free education even with basic educational level seems as quixotic idea.
Though the idea of free higher education sounds great in writing and for policy followers, the idea still so audacious due to no certainty in its return on risk and an overextending government spending. Every governments quite certainly dream of free education but balanced budget in investment in different fields should be judiciously considered for profitable benefit for all citizens but not students. Besides, education is necessary for development but taking education for granted would not encourage students to optimize the educational years. For instance, in Viet Nam, most students enter universities with no clear what major they will follow, why they follow the chosen major, so the free of charge to university seem unprofitable from government, specifically citizens tax. Or even with highly developed nation like America, tuition loan seems prevalent as a tool to support students to access higher education with less risk for government and also an encouragement for student to learn better to being worth the debt they bear.
In conclusion, full financial aid for admitted students who are unable to pay tuition is great but inapplicable free of charge higher education policy should not be practiced due to its inefficient investment and the different statuses of each country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1002, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...o an encouragement for student to learn better to being worth the debt they bear. I...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, so, still, therefore, as for, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 33.0505617978 27% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 27.0 12.9106741573 209% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2317.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 421.0 442.535393258 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50356294537 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88779842001 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541567695962 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 711.0 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.9810168045 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 165.5 118.986275619 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0714285714 23.4991977007 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78571428571 5.21951772744 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2454084557 0.243740707755 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0931587965016 0.0831039109588 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055784641704 0.0758088955206 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165000581908 0.150359130593 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428970656012 0.0667264976115 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.5 14.1392134831 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 48.8420337079 67% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 12.1743820225 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 12.1639044944 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 100.480337079 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.