Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and
development.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree
with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In
developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which
adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain
how these examples shape your position
The issue states that governments have to create few restrictions for conducting scientific research and development which is against the nature of science, because many scientists’ discoveries happened during a time of freedom and prosperity. I think governments should not limit the scientific research and they even have to support it in any direction.
One of the consequences of governmental intervention in scientific research is creating chaos in academic places which is harmful for both researchers and governors. For example, different laws by Iranian governemnts to monitor and formulate humanities with the aim of domestication of theories in Iran have not been helpful so far and just exacerbated the situation. This experience shows that restrictions are useless, for academicians look at theories from a different angle and probably are not willing to assent to the government policies. Moreover, using of force by governments prevent researchers to conduct researches wishfully and the final result will be a diseterous collection of aticles.
On the other hand, when governments enact specific laws to restrict the production of scientific research, the scholars and researchers cannot fully focus on their experiment or methodology, because they are forced to produce something which accords with the policies. Again the unwise actions of Iranian government to declare some research areas as forbidden and set further punishments for the unruly researchers is an illustrative example to clarify the issue. For instance, study about new sects or religions, sexual practices and the structure of governmental administrarion are among the subjects banned by governments which is obviously a restriction on research and development.
In summary, any form of restriction on the process of producing scientific research is deleterious for both governments and academcians, because of the dangerous consequences. A chaotic environment where some researchers cannot agree to the policies and a bias toward those polices which distracts prevents others to focus on experiments or methodologies are the possible results of governmental restrictions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-12-11 | Alone Librarian | 66 | view |
- Some people believe it is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders towithhold information from the public. Others believe that the public has a right tobe fully informed.Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns wi 83
- Working with hands or working with head and minds 60
- The following appeared in a memo from a budget planner for the city of Grandview."When the Grandview Symphony was established ten years ago, the city ofGrandview agreed to provide the symphony with annual funding until thesymphony became self-sustaining. 83
- The following appeared in a letter from the owner of the Sunnyside Towersapartment building to its manager."One month ago, all the showerheads on the first five floors of Sunnyside Towerswere modified to restrict the water flow to approximately one-third 66
- Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research anddevelopment.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagreewith the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. Indevelop 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, moreover, so, as for, as to, for example, for instance, i think, in summary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 33.0505617978 27% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1847.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 321.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.753894081 5.05705443957 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35603820018 2.79657885939 120% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 215.323595506 86% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576323987539 0.4932671777 117% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences, or put a space between two sentences.
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2587830856 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 167.909090909 118.986275619 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1818181818 23.4991977007 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.45454545455 5.21951772744 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236524427125 0.243740707755 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.099617089726 0.0831039109588 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0417658594111 0.0758088955206 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15714500963 0.150359130593 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0189501691881 0.0667264976115 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.2 14.1392134831 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.12 48.8420337079 51% => It means the essay is relatively harder to read.
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 12.1743820225 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.66 12.1639044944 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.38706741573 121% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.7820224719 144% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.