Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
The statement contends that there should be very few to no restriction on scientific research and development. I concede with the statement as I believe that research and development is the backbone of any country’s advancement and by employing restrictions, the government is only hindering the country’s progress even when the results seem virulent.
Scientific research and development helps a country move forward and not stay stuck. It makes everyday lives of people easier and automates process to minimize risks. For example, invention of machinery that replaces humans in dangerous jobs or development of vehicles and electricity has given us ample of time to focus on other societal issues. Restrictions imposed on research will have scientists stay in trepid and obstruct them to develop better technology.
Due to fewer restrictions on scientific research and development in america, Edward Teller developed hydrogen bomb that could decimate an entire city in minutes. Though being a very dangerous invention if america didn’t develop it first, other countries would have. As ironic as it is but in todays time as almost every country has nuclear power, the chances of WW3 happening are incredibly low. Another invention that is controversial is AI that can simulate human behaviour completely. There are chances that it can prove to be really harmful for humankind but I believe that anyone who can develop it should not be stopped just its usage should be monitored.
In sum, I agree with the statement that there should be very few to no restriction on scientific research and development. However, I do believe that the research should constantly be monitored.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-19 | Celestina Asantewaa | 83 | view |
| 2024-10-03 | shivamzala17 | 83 | view |
| 2024-10-03 | shivamzala17 | 75 | view |
| 2024-07-01 | MMoksha | 66 | view |
| 2024-06-29 | sefeliz | 83 | view |
- Colleges and universities should require their students to spend at least one semester studying in a foreign country 58
- Teachers salaries should be based on their students academic performance 75
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed 66
- Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development 50
- College students should be encouraged to pursue subjects that interest them rather than seek programs that promise entry into the job market 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 242, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y that replaces humans in dangerous jobs or development of vehicles and electrici...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, really, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 58.6224719101 46% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1426.0 2235.4752809 64% => OK
No of words: 267.0 442.535393258 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34082397004 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98108519535 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 215.323595506 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565543071161 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 704.065955056 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2882386518 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.692307692 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5384615385 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.69230769231 5.21951772744 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.383092733434 0.243740707755 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13310161987 0.0831039109588 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110566990121 0.0758088955206 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251997615744 0.150359130593 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0745764161787 0.0667264976115 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 100.480337079 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.