Government should place, few, if any restrictions on scientific research and development.
Scientific research can range from development of electricity to missile. Research can help society but it can also to harm surrounding in many ways, so there should be some limitation that should be enforced to development of research undertaken.
One reason for limiting the scientific research is that if one is set free to develop any kind of chemical in laboratory, he has all the liberty and no restriction to prepare any dangerous chemical. That chemical can be acid which someone can use to take revenge of any form and can be used for any personal use to harm any one, this will be serious threat to common people. This would not have been case if an individual is circumscribed to use or prepare chemical substance.
In addition, on setting limitation to scientific research we can save our environment to great extent. Because any manufacturer working in their process of making any substance in his factory is free to use any harmful substance irrespective of proper care or awareness just if it is economical for him to use, he can come up with any research or method on his way. This is dangerous for common people. For an instance, a pharmaceutical company who is responsible for making drugs can come with any method that is generating huge amount of toxic material, which eventually gets dumped to either river or is evaporated and turn into harmful gases. Moreover, same drug company can also come with any life killing drugs if not limited with restrictions. Drugs is capable of saving one’s life but also is equally capable to destroy one. One can come with any strong drug to prevent or fight against certain disease but it might also have certain side effects and can instead endanger the life. If government impose restrictions on usage of certain chemical it can be precluded.
To add more, one can develop hack to breach the security of any application, if one is set free to carry out any research or development. In fact, one can breach security of esteemed Government institution like Parliament, military or Air Force. One can alter the voting poll which can impact the whole nation with wrong Government getting elected. One can leak the military or Air Force to opponent which is again proven to be serious threat and can harm number of innocent people. The dangerous nuclear weapons can be developed if one is set free to do so. The nuclear weapon can kill many. So it is very essential to set boundaries in undertaking scientific research and development for nation’s safety
Of course not everyone agrees on the idea of putting restriction to scientific research because if one is set free to develop or carry out experiments on creating nuclear bombs it can help nation at time of terror to attack and defend from enemies. Like how Openheimmer came up with nuclear fusion reaction and in turns nuclear bombs that helped to fight during World War II. However all the freedom or liberties should be granted to some honored laboratory to conduct such critical experiments, under relevant guidance or else it can be very harmful and can cost human life.
- Government should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development 66
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition 66
- Universities should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 56, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...limiting the scientific research is that if one is set free to develop any kind o...
^^
Line 3, column 322, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anyone'?
Suggestion: anyone
...an be used for any personal use to harm any one, this will be serious threat to common ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, in addition, in fact, kind of, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 30.0 12.4196629213 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 58.6224719101 131% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 12.9106741573 170% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2573.0 2235.4752809 115% => OK
No of words: 530.0 442.535393258 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85471698113 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79809637944 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72997743377 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 215.323595506 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.471698113208 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 840.6 704.065955056 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.0747329727 60.3974514979 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.954545455 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0909090909 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.54545454545 5.21951772744 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225610054002 0.243740707755 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.079341849181 0.0831039109588 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0786985389624 0.0758088955206 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159029182784 0.150359130593 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0485789573084 0.0667264976115 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.