The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree to disagree with the statement and explain you reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways i which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Some people deems that whether an individual’s achievement is consider great or not is decided by the later generation instead of their peers during the same time. In my point of view, the answer depends on what area an individual pursue his/her career. For artist and political officials, it is more likely that the later generation would give a more objective and comprehensive critics to their achievement. On the contrary, as for leaders in any general corporation, there employees and consumers would give a better understanding to their efforts.
As for artist, who achieve their art work with a strong personal taste that not follow the majorities of their peers, often gain objections due to the divergence to the mainstream. Take Vincent van Gogh for example, he is a famous Dutch painter and influencial figures in the history of Western art, however, his work did not gain acceptance during his life time and he suffered poverty most of his life. Though it is understandable that people living in his time are not prepared with sufficient knowledge to understand artist work, it doesn’t mean that we could take their opinion as evidence to dispute the greatness of him. Same as politic figures, Xiaoping Deng, who is the first leader that encourage the reformation of Chinese economic development strategy, helped china choose a way that most of people in that time find to bold and obey the previous leader’s will, however, the later successful of china economy growth has proven how great his attribution is.
However, there are leaders need to be assessed by the people followed them and the population who they influenced the most. Such as the CEO of the monopoles, what they do may not affect the future generation greater than the current people, such as the decision to set factories in which places, would greatly influence the price of product and job opportunities open to which places. Most factories closed the native plants due to seeking lower labor price in other country while ignoring the importance that jobs means to the local people. It would be reasonable to consider what the contemporaries say about the leaders. And if the quality compromised for the seek of lower cost, the voices of customer must to be heard when it comes to judging the leader’s behaviors.
In a word, it is the areas and nature of one’s work that determined whether the people in the same time or the later generation can provide a better consideration to the greatness of one individual.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-08 | stevewang1007 | 58 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | cnegus | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-21 | IFE360TOXIC | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | Raian Islam | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-09 | Zhang Ergou | 70 | view |
- The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree to disagree with the statement and explain you reasoning for the position you ta 66
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who can not afford the tuition. 66
- The primary goal of technological advancement should be to increase people’s efficiency so that they have more leisure timeWrite a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for 66
- The following appeared in a letter to the school board in the town of Centerville."All students should be required to take the driver's education course at Centerville High School. In the past two years several accidents in and around Centervill 55
- A recent study reported that pet owners have longer, healthier lives on average than do people who own no pets. Specifically, dog owners tend to have a lower incidence of heart disease. In light of these findings, Sherwood Hospital should form a partnersh 69
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 68, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'considered'.
Suggestion: considered
...her an individual's achievement is consider great or not is decided by the later ge...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 354, Rule ID: LIFE_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lifetime'?
Suggestion: lifetime
...work did not gain acceptance during his life time and he suffered poverty most of his lif...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 521, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... with sufficient knowledge to understand artist work, it doesn't mean that w...
^^
Line 3, column 803, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...trategy, helped china choose a way that most of people in that time find to bold and obey the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 707, Rule ID: MUST_HAVE_TO[1]
Message: After 'must', the verb is used without 'to'. Probably, you should use 'must' or 'have to' here.
Suggestion: must; have to
...k of lower cost, the voices of customer must to be heard when it comes to judging the l...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 205, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion to the greatness of one individual.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, so, while, as for, for example, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2110.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 421.0 442.535393258 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01187648456 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84884758171 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55106888361 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 658.8 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.2254810777 60.3974514979 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.714285714 118.986275619 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0714285714 23.4991977007 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 5.21951772744 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119476343354 0.243740707755 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0437843209606 0.0831039109588 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0242663309453 0.0758088955206 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0677484216965 0.150359130593 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0211572800145 0.0667264976115 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 14.1392134831 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 48.8420337079 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.1743820225 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.37 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 100.480337079 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.