The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
when we look back on the past, we will find a great number of outstanding achievements were not appreciate by the people at that time, by contrast, people in the later generation correctly recognized these achievements. although some remarkable achievement hard to recognized by the people at that time because of its radical nature, it is not mean that all of brilliant individuals and achievements could not be recognized by their contemporaries. I will try to illustrate it in the following essay.
when we look back to the history, people at contemporary hold a different perspective with people at that time, it is easier for people to make a comprehensive evaluation for some individuals and events, when people have more information about the subsequent impact of these individuals and events. For example, vincent van gogh, one of the famous painting of the world, has not be accept by peer and public at that time, during his life, almost non of painting of him have been sold and eventually he commits suicide. However, contemporary people regard he as pioneer of post-impressionism because of his outstanding breakthrough of art. radical individuals and works are generally hard to accept by people at that time, but can be appreciate by people at the later generation, just like vincent van gogh. since no people could portent the impact of these individuals that seems meaningless and subversion of tradition.
although some individuals could not be appreciated by their contemporary, some contribution and achievement of brilliant people could be realized immediately. which depend on their field. For example, art and literary achievement tend be recognize by the people at later generation, but science sport and business breakthrough are easer by appreciated immediately. when Einstein came up with relativity theory, the theory shake the whole physics immediate. Production line technology， came up by Ford, benefits public of America， bring cheap and durable vehicle to every family，which stimulate America economy immediately. All of this achievement could be judge by their contemporary. In some other situation, individuals hard be evaluate by particular group of people, since contribution of them have both long-term and short-term impact. For example, one-child policy of China makes most family could not have more than one child, which makes a lot of public unpleasant at that time. but this policy release population pressure efficiently and avoid a lot of potential resource and energy problem. In this case, both people at that time and contemporary could evaluate the policy and judge the politicians.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-05 | Dipper | 50 | view |
| 2019-09-14 | 1172910232 | 50 | view |
- Instilling a sense of cooperation in young people is, if not the best, a very good way to prepare them forleadership roles.It may be true that competition hinders mutual development of peersand as a result younger generation may find themselves underprepa 16
- “Critical judgement of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.”Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting y 54
- Some people claim that you can tell whether a nation is great by looking at the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists. Others argue that the surest indicator of a great nation is, in fact, the general welfare of all its people.Write a respons 70
- The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you 50
- “Critical judgement of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.” 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
when we look back on the past, we will find ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 97, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'appreciated'.
Suggestion: appreciated
...er of outstanding achievements were not appreciate by the people at that time, by contrast...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 221, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Although
...orrectly recognized these achievements. although some remarkable achievement hard to rec...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ustrate it in the following essay. when we look back to the history, people...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
... it in the following essay. when we look back to the history, people at ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 380, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...e famous painting of the world, has not be accept by peer and public at that time,...
^^
Line 9, column 640, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Radical
...of his outstanding breakthrough of art. radical individuals and works are generally har...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 808, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Since
...generation, just like vincent van gogh. since no people could portent the impact of t...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gless and subversion of tradition. although some individuals could not be a...
^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Although
...nd subversion of tradition. although some individuals could not be appreciat...
^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 160, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Which
...t people could be realized immediately. which depend on their field. For example, art...
^^^^^
Line 17, column 160, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t people could be realized immediately. which depend on their field. For example, art...
^^^^^
Line 17, column 366, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...h are easer by appreciated immediately. when Einstein came up with relativity theory...
^^^^
Line 17, column 987, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
... lot of public unpleasant at that time. but this policy release population pressure...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2245.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 416.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39663461538 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1703286102 2.79657885939 113% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483173076923 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 711.0 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.7526528811 60.3974514979 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.722222222 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1111111111 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.16666666667 5.21951772744 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 14.0 7.80617977528 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102645125525 0.243740707755 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0403209073017 0.0831039109588 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0346655321192 0.0758088955206 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0726449883508 0.150359130593 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0259389592103 0.0667264976115 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.1639044944 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.