The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Would machines have ever existed if the greater minds did not think like they did? Would we be able to solve the complex problems like machines do so efficiently and accurately? It may seem like a paradox but human minds and machines go hand in hand. The question of human minds being superior to machines is a quandary to me. I believe that humans created machines for their convenience and it may be before that “great minds lead to great inventions” but nowadays these great inventions lead to a greater good. So, in my opinion it is a give and take situation in today’s day and age. Reflecting upon examples of Abacus and the invention and usage of super computers, we can see how sometimes the human mind is superior and how computer outstrips a human mind.
Starting with the first computer ever created by Charles Babbage, called Abacus we can see how his innovation lead others to creating wonders in the field of computers. A simple counting device was made by using a frame with rods containing movable elements that helped in calculations. Surely, this was a revolutionary technology brought to life by a great mind and paved the way to achieve more and finally creating a programmable computer. Here it is evident how a human mind is superior to a machine.
On the other hand, we can see that how the revolution brought by a programmable computer lead the humans to create a super computer by programming it with a variety of formulas and theories. These super computers have helped the human minds to comprehend the unfathomable mathematical and scientific problems. Consequently, if we see that if it weren’t for super computers, humanity would have still struggled with a lot of conundrums and dilemmas. And even if people tried to solve these problems, which could have taken months or years to solve, there was no guarantee that the results accomplished will be accurate. The fact that super computers solve these problems efficiently and with speed saves human time and energy. Therefore, here machines supersede the human minds.
To sum up, I would say that the question of humans being superior to machines is really a matter of objectivity, because sometimes humans supersede machines and sometimes machines help humans to achieve the insurmountable.
- The first step to self-knowledge is rejection of the familiar.________________________________________Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you t 50
- The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In d 50
- The main benefit of the study of history is to dispel the illusion that people living now are significantly different from people who lived in earlier times.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 50
- The following recommendation appeared in a memo from the mayor of the town of Hopewell."Two years ago, the nearby town of Ocean View built a new municipal golf course and resort hotel. During the past two years, tourism in Ocean View has increased, new bu 77
- When old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes, modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, if, may, really, so, still, therefore, in my opinion, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1919.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 384.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99739583333 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90940199258 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489583333333 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 611.1 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7677172139 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.611111111 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.21951772744 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251166457197 0.243740707755 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0943662103712 0.0831039109588 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06739808342 0.0758088955206 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168409439393 0.150359130593 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0648240290855 0.0667264976115 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.