"The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds."
Machines can be considered best friends of a human being in today's world. The technology has taken a wide turn over the years, making humans addicted to it and by becoming a crucial part of the daily life. Machines can perform many of the tasks similar to humans and can even do it faster and in a better way, but by the end of the day, it is a human only who made the machines capable enough to perform such tasks. And I would like to introduce some of the keynotes in the favor of the above statement.
Firstly, humans made machines to accomplish difficult tasks easily and conveniently. They consider it as one of their most efficient and prominent invention. And giving a glance in today's environment, we are occupied more with machines than with any living or natural thing. Take it from the mobile phones for communication, vehicles for transportation, electricity, air conditioners or fans, our every basic need includes one or the other machinery items. It is the human brain only why all of such facilities are present in the world.
No machine can be credited or blamed for creating another machine. Yes, one can say that today because of the artificial intelligence, robots can be made who can build other machines, but again it was the human mind only who researched so much in the artificial intelligence to make a robot. So, it will be wrong that any machine is superior to human mind.
Secondly, as the statement asserts that the machines are only the tools of human minds. There are hundreds and thousands of examples why this statement is true. For instance, there will be one in a million people who can perform complex mathematic calculations in mind, but it doesn't mean that other people don't understand the calculation. They might do it, but it will be way more time consuming. To solve problems like these, humans created machines like calculators, computers, binary systems, which can perform the same task in less time. It was the rudimentary example how the human minds are creating machinery tools for making things easier for human minds.
Thirdly, one can question that the humans are using the machines itself for creating other machines and state it as one of the reasons for them being superior to humans. Again, this statement is thoroughly accurate till an extent as one cannot build a car without its engine or there is no possible way of creating a notebook without the paper which comes from the tree. People use these machines in their recent inventions because this is what they are made for, making things easier for humans in their work.
But talking about the ancient history of the machines, those things which people merely consider a machine today: a wheel, which was invented by a human mind without the help of any other machine or the fire, from which humans were afraid of because they didn't know how it was occurring. It was the human mind only which made it possible to understand these basic machineries.
Concluding my point in the favor of the writer, there is no machine which can be superior to the human brain. Machines surely have the ability to do work similar to humans but what differs them from us is the ability to think and the ability to understand, which we call intelligence.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-18 | Rashi123 | 62 | view |
| 2019-08-12 | hrutvik246 | 50 | view |
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore the negative ones. 50
- Public figures such as actors, politicians, and athletes should expect people to be interested in their private lives. When they seek a public role, they should expect that they will lose at least some of their privacy. 50
- Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or m 50
- "Public figures such as actors, politicians, and athletes should expect people to be interested in their private lives. When they seek a public role, they should expect that they will lose at least some of their privacy." 50
- Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present. Do you agree or disagree? 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 447, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ch tasks. And I would like to introduce some of the keynotes in the favor of the above stat...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 358, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... any machine is superior to human mind. Secondly, as the statement asserts that ...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 278, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...mathematic calculations in mind, but it doesnt mean that other people dont understand ...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 308, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...d, but it doesnt mean that other people dont understand the calculation. They might ...
^^^^
Line 13, column 666, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r making things easier for human minds. Thirdly, one can question that the human...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 256, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...hich humans were afraid of because they didnt know how it was occurring. It was the h...
^^^^^
Line 21, column 378, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to understand these basic machineries. Concluding my point in the favor of the ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, for instance, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 19.5258426966 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 33.0505617978 136% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2706.0 2235.4752809 121% => OK
No of words: 566.0 442.535393258 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78091872792 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.87757670434 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56049434757 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 215.323595506 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.452296819788 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 859.5 704.065955056 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2824291 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.24 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.64 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 5.21951772744 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377386592952 0.243740707755 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131984808875 0.0831039109588 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106277390511 0.0758088955206 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215543073384 0.150359130593 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526784805127 0.0667264976115 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.