If people disregard the great works of the past, it is because these works no longer answer the needs of the present.
If we look at there have been many inventions that have influenced the world greatly and made it what it is now. These inventions and discoveries are taken for granted, if not for these inventions things would have been very different. These inventions may not be used much these days but they forms the basics for many new technologies.
For example, engineer students are not thought about present day technologies they are thought about old that technologies and then thought about newer technologies because strong basics are required to excel in any field. Past is the foundation for a strong future.
learning from the past and planing for the future, that is how humanity evolved and overcame many crisis. If these works from past are disregarded mankind will never advance. In India children are told stories about great kings and smart ministers how they dealt with problems. These stories have nothing to do with the present but they give children moral values and makes them want to be brave like those kings and smart like those ministers.
Accordingly, even Albert Einstein wouldn't have been able to do his work with out the knowledge from his predecessors. Every work done is based on works of ancestors.
so to sum it up, works of the past are need to advance into the future.
- Practicality is now our great idol which all powers and talents must serve Anything that is not obviously practical has little value in today s world 22
- It is a grave mistake to theorize before one has data. 50
- If people disregard the great works of the past, it is because these works no longer answer the needs of the present. 41
- As we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and more mysterious. 16
- Success, whether academic or professional, involves an ability to survive in a new environment and, eventually, to change it. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 205, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had been'?
Suggestion: had been
...ted, if not for these inventions things would have been very different. These inventions may no...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 295, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'form'
Suggestion: form
...ay not be used much these days but they forms the basics for many new technologies. ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Learning
... the foundation for a strong future. learning from the past and planing for the futur...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 94, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun crisis seems to be countable; consider using: 'many crises'.
Suggestion: many crises
...at is how humanity evolved and overcame many crisis. If these works from past are disregard...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 107, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...anity evolved and overcame many crisis. If these works from past are disregarded m...
^^
Line 7, column 35, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
.... Accordingly, even Albert Einstein wouldnt have been able to do his work with out ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 73, Rule ID: WITH_OUT[1]
Message: This word is usually written together. Did you mean 'without'?
Suggestion: without
...n wouldnt have been able to do his work with out the knowledge from his predecessors. Ev...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...done is based on works of ancestors. so to sum it up, works of the past are nee...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['accordingly', 'but', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'so', 'then', 'for example']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.214285714286 0.240241500013 89% => OK
Verbs: 0.218487394958 0.157235817809 139% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0756302521008 0.0880659088768 86% => OK
Adverbs: 0.046218487395 0.0497285424764 93% => OK
Pronouns: 0.046218487395 0.0444667217837 104% => OK
Prepositions: 0.126050420168 0.12292977631 103% => OK
Participles: 0.0756302521008 0.0406280797675 186% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.48203141089 2.79330140395 89% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0252100840336 0.030933414821 81% => OK
Particles: 0.00840336134454 0.0016655270985 505% => OK
Determiners: 0.0840336134454 0.0997080785238 84% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0126050420168 0.0249443105267 51% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0252100840336 0.0148568991511 170% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1300.0 2732.02544248 48% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 221.0 452.878318584 49% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.88235294118 6.0361032391 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 4.58838876751 84% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.266968325792 0.366273622748 73% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.230769230769 0.280924506359 82% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.14479638009 0.200843997647 72% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0904977375566 0.132149295362 68% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48203141089 2.79330140395 89% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 219.290929204 57% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570135746606 0.48968727796 116% => OK
Word variations: 54.5163650456 55.4138127331 98% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6194690265 58% => OK
Sentence length: 18.4166666667 23.380412469 79% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9832146577 59.4972553346 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.333333333 141.124799967 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4166666667 23.380412469 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 0.674092028746 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.21349557522 153% => OK
Readability: 41.4935897436 51.4728631049 81% => OK
Elegance: 1.33783783784 1.64882698954 81% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311183730827 0.391690518653 79% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.170959865094 0.123202303941 139% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0970410033106 0.077325440228 125% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.604301423646 0.547984918172 110% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.207469400324 0.149214159877 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139373275677 0.161403998019 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0926824350062 0.0892212321368 104% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.153683444521 0.385218514788 40% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0327443665364 0.0692045440612 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195792840893 0.275328986314 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0859399979691 0.0653680567796 131% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.4325221239 48% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.30420353982 38% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88274336283 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 7.22455752212 42% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.70907079646 185% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 13.5995575221 74% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 41.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.