If two applicants for a job are otherwise equally qualified, the job should go to the applicant with more experience.
Write a response in which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the specific circumstances in which adopting the position would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Whenever a company or organization faces a dilemma when they have to choose between two candidates, they are more likely to choose the one with more experience than the other. Experience is considered one of the most prominent factors in a candidate which gives a candidate an upper edge. Here, I strongly agree with the statement that between two equally qualified candidates, unarguably the one with more experience should be offered a job.
Let us commence with a scenario where you are an owner or an HR of a company and you have to choose between two candidates who are equally qualified. Now, What will be your deciding parameter? Most probably it will be to judge them on the basis of the experience they have. Because even long-term studies have proven that experience can bring more value to the place and benefit the organization. A person with more experience is most probably the one who has faced all those difficulties which a person with less experience may perhaps face in the future. Thus, it will always be beneficial to hire an applicant with more experience.
Moreover, the candidate with more experience has probably faced more failure. And no doubt, failure can teach a person more lessons than anything else in life. Even if we cite an example of any organization may it be a local or a multinational one, we have often noticed that the people with the most experience are always in a higher position. This is because every company and organization understand the importance of experience and failures and how this shapes a person to be technically as well as mentally strong. And, not only the experienced person will benefit the company directly through their decision-making skills and experience but they can also guide their juniors and help them grow in their career by sharing their experience with them and even they can prevent them from committing all those mistakes which they have committed in their early days.
On the contrary, some people would question that is it always necessary that a more experienced candidate will always bring more benefit to the organization than one with less experience. Yes, there may be some exceptions where a person with less experience has proven to be a better asset to a company than one with more experience. but at the end of the day, they are all just mere exceptions, and the probability that the one with more experience will bring more value to the organization will always be higher. The other common argument that an individual can raise is that a person with more experience will demand more salary than the other candidate. Yes, again it can be true in some situations. But, It is indeed a good idea to pay some extra amount while trading the experience because the one with more experience can bring more profit to a company.
In a nutshell, There are enormous benefits that an experienced person can bring to the organization than the one with less experience. And it is always a good idea to hire a candidate with equal qualifications but more experience.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-28 | Pranav Pipada | 83 | view |
- If two applicants for a job are otherwise equally qualified the job should go to the applicant with more experience Write a response in which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and s 83
- Five years ago the local university built two new dormitories through different contractors Aleph Construction and Gimmel Builders The buildings were nearly identical though it cost Gimmel Builders approximately 20 more to construct its dormitory Aleph s 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 526, Rule ID: MIGHT_PERHAPS[1]
Message: Use simply 'may', 'perhaps'.
Suggestion: may; perhaps
...ies which a person with less experience may perhaps face in the future. Thus, it will alway...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 335, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
... company than one with more experience. but at the end of the day, they are all jus...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, so, thus, well, while, no doubt, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 35.0 12.9106741573 271% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2534.0 2235.4752809 113% => OK
No of words: 521.0 442.535393258 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86372360845 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77759609229 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77561237908 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.399232245681 0.4932671777 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 844.2 704.065955056 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.2753558754 60.3974514979 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.181818182 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6818181818 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.09090909091 5.21951772744 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224828717465 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0867835785231 0.0831039109588 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06879712065 0.0758088955206 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153571206443 0.150359130593 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560089357073 0.0667264976115 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.