ignoring negative actions and just focusing on the positives is a better way to teach.
"Smooth seas do not make skillful sailors." We've all heard successful people in the world talk about their failures more than success. They emphasize that the learning process needs more failures than success. Failures push a person on the road of self-betterment and learning.
The statement implies that ignoring negative actions and just focusing on the positives is a better way to teach." A little learning is a dangerous thing", Take the trivial example of learning how to drive a car. If the respective instructor just keeps on praising how good a person is with driving the car in a straight line and ignores the rash turns the person is making, would be life endangering. Calling out negative actions is just as important as praising the positive ones. Part of the learning process is to be aware of one's strong and weak suits. If that person focuses on his betterment and practices making turns, he would become a better driver. Education is considered as the most powerful weapon of life to get victory and success. This great responsibility and job are given to the teachers to nourish and shape up the lives of young ones and the future of their country.
Teaching an individual is a huge responsibility. A teacher is a person who shapes the future of everyone by providing the best education to her/his students. Sometimes awarding their students for their great works however sometimes punish them to let them understand that they did something wrong which is bad for their life. They make their students able to differentiate between right or wrong so that they can choose for the right one in their life by fighting with wrong.
"Spoon feeding, in the long run, teaches us nothing but the shape of the spoon.” Learning is just like a coin failure and success are its two sides. A coin without one side is useless, similarly learning without failure is vain. Someone has rightly said," You don't learn to walk by following rules. You learn by doing, and by falling over".
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-30 | Dikshaa_007 | 58 | view |
- The graphs above give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010, and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comp 67
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developi 33
- the animals have no place in the 21 century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. to what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- In most professions and academic fields, imagination is more important than knowledge. 50
- As we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and mysterious. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 55, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: We've
...eas do not make skillful sailors.' Weve all heard successful people in the worl...
^^^^
Line 7, column 91, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...othing but the shape of the spoon.' Learning is just like a coin failure and...
^^
Line 7, column 265, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ailure is vain. Someone has rightly said,' You dont learn to walk by following ru...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 277, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...in. Someone has rightly said,' You dont learn to walk by following rules. You l...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, similarly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1694.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 342.0 442.535393258 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95321637427 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79499741201 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570175438596 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 704.065955056 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.4224982506 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1111111111 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.72222222222 5.21951772744 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216956191663 0.243740707755 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0658328937641 0.0831039109588 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116880124419 0.0758088955206 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112890004744 0.150359130593 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.14939572666 0.0667264976115 224% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.