The issue states that in the field of profession and academy, imagination is more vital than knowledge. Because of the controversary of this topic, I don't think there is general argument on this issue. I am, however, to a great extent, against the statement for the following reasons.
For one thing, useful and practical imagination comes from knowledge, and imgaination that comes from nowhere can only count as daydream, especially in the world of profession and academic. For example, most of the theories purposed by anthropologists are the reconstructions in their minds of how ancient people lived their life in an environment that we could not tell today. However, imagination or reconstructions like these are based on their knowledge about the remains and fossils, without which they could not prove their imagination reasonable. For this example, we can notice that knowledge dose play an important role when we try to construct valuable and useful imagination.
For another, knowledge is the foundation of the realization of imagination. Image that if everyone in the world is good at imagining but no one has the knowledge to make them come true, what our live would be today. There is no doubt that Steve Jobs had one of the most creative imagination in the world. He changed the world by designing the most advanced intelligent cellphone in the world that no one could imagine before. However, the production of these cellphones relies heavily on knowledge ranging from electronic engineering, material to algorithm. If there was not knowledge, Iphone could noly be a good design instead of a good product.
However, what I argue above dose not draw the whole picture. Good imagination often brings us big surprise and can be a powerful driving force behind the development of the society. For example, painters during Rennaisance used their brilliant and unprecedented imagination to reveal the truth of nature and guide people to reflect on their own instead of God. In cases like this, imagination could make a great difference since it breaks the constrains of religion or authority.
For the reasons above, I thinks knowledge plays a role as foundation in the process of construction and realization of imagination, which should not be ignored, especially in the field of profession and academy.
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reason 83
- University should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure t 66
- University should require every student to take a variety of cources outside the student's field of study. 66
- College and university should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in profession relevant to the courses they teach.Should colleges and university faculty be encouraged to work outside the academic field which they have rel 90
- TPO-48 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 151, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...e of the controversary of this topic, I dont think there is general argument on this...
^^^^
Line 9, column 26, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[1]
Message: The pronoun 'I' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'think'
Suggestion: think
... authority. For the reasons above, I thinks knowledge plays a role as foundation in...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, for example, i think, no doubt, for one thing, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 12.9106741573 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1951.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 377.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.175066313 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99308163378 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527851458886 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 620.1 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.740449438202 270% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0919201272 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.388888889 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9444444444 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156676484077 0.243740707755 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0504760571737 0.0831039109588 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0354270067075 0.0758088955206 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.086098034548 0.150359130593 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0229520082456 0.0667264976115 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.