It is easy to welcome innovation and accept new ideas. What most people find difficult,
however, is accepting the way these new ideas are put into practice.
Innovations were undertaken to change and to aggrandise the way we live our life. In the past people invented machineries and products whose production needed a lot of natural resources such as wood, crude oil, fish oils and other various kinds of natural resources but as people became fond of these new inventions, the use of these products has also seen a rising curve, leading to today's issues such as global warming, deforestation, natural imbalance, biodiversity loss etc. This phenomenon had compelled the researchers to work for sustainable development. Therefore, it is the reason, why latest innovations are somewhat harder to accept, as sustainable development, in most cases, make use of the non-classical way and may sometimes include compromises.
Yes, adapting to new technology do require some amount of adjustment. Today's developments are all in relation to sustainable development, hence, may sometimes shift drastically from the dogmatic way of doing things. For example, in construction industry developers has created a house which is made of sawdust concrete, which is light weight and made use of the leftovers from the timber industry, a novel, and sustainable approach, but it was hard to convince people that the house was completely safe.
scientist have developed a bio-admixture to be added to concrete to make it strong durable as well as sustainable, it uses water extract of water hyacinth or okra or palm tree extract but did not gain popularity as it was a different approach. For example in India okra and water hyacinth is easily available but people refused to make use of it. they were afraid of the new approach. so, yes, it is difficult to make people accept the new ideas.
Here, one may argue that apart from construction field it may be possible to make people accept new ideas. yes sometimes it may be possible but rarely it is true. For example, people are ready to readily buy google glass, not only because it is a unique device but mostly because it was well promoted. In this technological era, people first look for reviews about the technology and then proceed for buying.
Therefore, i would like to posit that due to latest available high-tech gadgets, today's innovation are getting diversified and are also prone to sharp turns, due to which the acceptance among the people has decreased. this attitude of the people can be overcomes by actually showing prototypes of the designed innovation, before actually allowing to risk themselves
- The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting you 50
- In order to help small besiness thrive government should play a minimal role in private businee matters. 83
- It is easy to welcome innovation and accept new ideas. What most people find difficult,however, is accepting the way these new ideas are put into practice. 51
- Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 58
- If you could change one important thing about your hometown, what would you change? Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 330, Rule ID: LIGHT_WEIGHT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lightweight'?
Suggestion: lightweight
...h is made of sawdust concrete, which is light weight and made use of the leftovers from the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Scientist
...that the house was completely safe. scientist have developed a bio-admixture to be ad...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 386, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
.... they were afraid of the new approach. so, yes, it is difficult to make people ac...
^^
Line 7, column 108, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Yes
...ssible to make people accept new ideas. yes sometimes it may be possible but rarely...
^^^
Line 9, column 12, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...then proceed for buying. Therefore, i would like to posit that due to latest ...
^
Line 9, column 43, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'to the latest'.
Suggestion: to the latest
...erefore, i would like to posit that due to latest available high-tech gadgets, todays inn...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 219, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...eptance among the people has decreased. this attitude of the people can be overcomes...
^^^^
Line 9, column 348, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'risking'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: risking
...ed innovation, before actually allowing to risk themselves
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'also', 'but', 'first', 'hence', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'well', 'apart from', 'for example', 'such as', 'as well as', 'in most cases', 'it is true']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.230263157895 0.240241500013 96% => OK
Verbs: 0.175438596491 0.157235817809 112% => OK
Adjectives: 0.118421052632 0.0880659088768 134% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0570175438596 0.0497285424764 115% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0350877192982 0.0444667217837 79% => OK
Prepositions: 0.094298245614 0.12292977631 77% => OK
Participles: 0.0416666666667 0.0406280797675 103% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.91289075296 2.79330140395 104% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0438596491228 0.030933414821 142% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0701754385965 0.0997080785238 70% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.015350877193 0.0249443105267 62% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0109649122807 0.0148568991511 74% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2502.0 2732.02544248 92% => OK
No of words: 409.0 452.878318584 90% => OK
Chars per words: 6.1173594132 6.0361032391 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.58838876751 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.38141809291 0.366273622748 104% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.273838630807 0.280924506359 97% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.21271393643 0.200843997647 106% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.156479217604 0.132149295362 118% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91289075296 2.79330140395 104% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 219.290929204 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545232273839 0.48968727796 111% => OK
Word variations: 62.5830839168 55.4138127331 113% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6194690265 82% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0588235294 23.380412469 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 92.7886686197 59.4972553346 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.176470588 141.124799967 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0588235294 23.380412469 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.05882352941 0.674092028746 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.21349557522 153% => OK
Readability: 51.4426866101 51.4728631049 100% => OK
Elegance: 1.36885245902 1.64882698954 83% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329788625432 0.391690518653 84% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.118918395625 0.123202303941 97% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0932025116909 0.077325440228 121% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.541984159118 0.547984918172 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.162902380822 0.149214159877 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137575365001 0.161403998019 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0878359701206 0.0892212321368 98% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.297012472257 0.385218514788 77% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0872906668695 0.0692045440612 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209603895767 0.275328986314 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289369930858 0.0653680567796 44% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.4325221239 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88274336283 82% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 7.22455752212 125% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.66592920354 82% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 13.5995575221 110% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.