It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves.
Topic states that we define ourselves mostly with our identification with our social group. Indisputably, this is true when it comes to most of the people we tend to define ourselves with social status given by the society. Nevertheless, our identification is not dependent on our social status but with our inner growth of ourselves. Thus i generally disagree with the opinion that our identification with social groups solely defines ourselves, and like to argue that its just another achievement of person not the identity of person.
First of all, In general people try to define themselves as a certain status that social group had decided for that person. This is generally not true because the social status is not one's identity but it is feat achieved by that people. For example, when we ask people who are you?. They tried to answer this question by giving occupational answers like , I am Businessman or I am fireman. But, this is social status given according to their job. This is not any performance mark for define ourselves.
In sum, people try to define themselves by any social rank, it's not the measure to define ourselves. As long as people use it as only a social definition it's good okay. But, it should not be primly definition of people. In fact, we can say that by living in some social group , it does not mean that people contain certain characteristics that group had, but it is social feat achieved by people of that group and it's not their identity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | jason123 | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | samruddh_shah | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-07 | skylarzjy | 58 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | Kutumba kasyap | 83 | view |
| 2019-10-30 | Vaibhav Panchal | 58 | view |
- To serve the housing needs of our students, Buckingham College should build a number of new dormitories. Buckingham's enrollment is growing and, based on current trends, will double over the next 50 years, thus making existing dormitory space inadequate. 66
- It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves. 40
- The following appeared in a memo at XYZ company. "When XYZ lays off employees, it pays Delany Personnel Firm to offer those employees assistance in creating résumés and developing interviewing skills, if they so desire. Laid-off employees have benefited 50
- Claim: The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.Reason: Heroes and role models reveal a society's highest ideals. 85
- people's behavior is largely dependent by forces not their own making. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 336, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...but with our inner growth of ourselves. Thus i generally disagree with the opinion t...
^^^^
Line 3, column 185, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...t true because the social status is not ones identity but it is feat achieved by tha...
^^^^
Line 3, column 355, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...tion by giving occupational answers like , I am Businessman or I am fireman. But, ...
^^
Line 5, column 61, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...o define themselves by any social rank, its not the measure to define ourselves. As...
^^^
Line 5, column 276, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... say that by living in some social group , it does not mean that people contain ce...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'if', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'thus', 'for example', 'in fact', 'in general', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.20350877193 0.240241500013 85% => OK
Verbs: 0.143859649123 0.157235817809 91% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0877192982456 0.0880659088768 100% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0701754385965 0.0497285424764 141% => OK
Pronouns: 0.108771929825 0.0444667217837 245% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.136842105263 0.12292977631 111% => OK
Participles: 0.0245614035088 0.0406280797675 60% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.71112312114 2.79330140395 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0280701754386 0.030933414821 91% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0736842105263 0.0997080785238 74% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00701754385965 0.0249443105267 28% => Some modal verbs wanted.
WH_determiners: 0.0140350877193 0.0148568991511 94% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1483.0 2732.02544248 54% => OK
No of words: 259.0 452.878318584 57% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.72586872587 6.0361032391 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.58838876751 87% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.34749034749 0.366273622748 95% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.189189189189 0.280924506359 67% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.131274131274 0.200843997647 65% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0965250965251 0.132149295362 73% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71112312114 2.79330140395 97% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 219.290929204 55% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.467181467181 0.48968727796 95% => OK
Word variations: 43.2929961325 55.4138127331 78% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6194690265 68% => OK
Sentence length: 18.5 23.380412469 79% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8073592613 59.4972553346 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.928571429 141.124799967 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 23.380412469 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.714285714286 0.674092028746 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.94800884956 61% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.21349557522 96% => OK
Readability: 37.4189189189 51.4728631049 73% => OK
Elegance: 1.13043478261 1.64882698954 69% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.410606459213 0.391690518653 105% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.146629641966 0.123202303941 119% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0832610653906 0.077325440228 108% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.512733861497 0.547984918172 94% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.139155043217 0.149214159877 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171481206671 0.161403998019 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126146337429 0.0892212321368 141% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.39733111566 0.385218514788 103% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0541853784935 0.0692045440612 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.312745506603 0.275328986314 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.132097907762 0.0653680567796 202% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.4325221239 58% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.30420353982 38% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88274336283 123% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 7.22455752212 69% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 13.5995575221 66% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.