Leaders are created by the demands that are placed on them.
The world is filled with leaders, men and women, alike, who have their stories of how they became leaders. Indisputibly, some leaders are created by the demands that are placed on them. Any president from the moment she or he takes office becomes the leader of our nation, as our problems, needs and other demands are placed on the shoulders of the newest president. However, there are many other people who become leaders, not by any demands being placed on them. Indeed, many people become leaders by the demands they place on themselves.
First, consider Jeff Bezos, the CEO of Amazon. Before he started Amazon, Bezos worked on Wallstreet, and made a six figure income. He did not have to create Amazon; in fact, no demands was placed on him other than the demands which he placed on his self. For example, he borrowed one hundred thousands dollars of his parents money, which they acquired with the sell of their home. From his parent’s investments, he built the great company of Amazon that we know and love today, and became a great leader and entrepreneur.
Additionally, consider Dave Ramsey, debt critic and famous radio personality. Other than the poor circumstances in which he found himself, Ramsey did not have any demands placed on him. After accumulating almost four million dollars in real estate, Ramsey lost everything due to a change in laws. His lenders took everything he owned, and it inspired him to never owe anything to anyone ever again. He became the great leader of The Ramsey Corporation by the demands he placed on himself, not because others placed demands on him.
To conclude, although some leaders are created by the demands that are placed on them by others (for example, politicians and world leaders), many become leaders because their own demands placed on themselves. These great leaders had high expectations of themselves, and therefore became the inspiring leaders we know today.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-24 | amandali2921 | 93 | view |
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and 50
- “The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fi elds is by instilling in them a sense of coop-eration, not competition.”Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or 54
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and 50
- It is more harmful to compromise one's own beliefs than to adhere to them.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and suppo 66
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and su 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, so, therefore, for example, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 12.4196629213 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 12.9106741573 8% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 2235.4752809 72% => OK
No of words: 323.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99380804954 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54446976986 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 215.323595506 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513931888545 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 704.065955056 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.1567519092 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.8823529412 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.21951772744 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.452941850444 0.243740707755 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173772073729 0.0831039109588 209% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.2106767782 0.0758088955206 278% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.320935887246 0.150359130593 213% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.148585572421 0.0667264976115 223% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 100.480337079 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.