The writer have the assertion that many important discoveries or creations are accidental; they are the result of unanticipated outcome. However, i disagree with that statement. Researchers and scientists put huge amount of effort for the invention and discovery in certain topics and they work very hard to get the fruitful outcome from that. If the discoveries and inventions are able to get through the accidental process then, probably they wouldn't have to work so hard and with such devotion in their field.
For example, Madam Curie work so hard to discover Uranium. She put her life in danger to for that discovery and get cancer in her late life due to the harmful radiation coming out of the Uranium. Thomas Edition work so hard to invent the electric bulb, which is the pioneer invention in the scientific history. While talking about the creation in arts, famous artist Leonardo Da Vinchi created the world famous art of "Monalisa", which didn't happened accidentally. There are much more examples which proves that scientific discoveries and creations can't happen accidentally. Moreover, scientists and artists have to put their great amount of effort to achieve such discovery.
If Wright brothers wouldn't have work with such dedication and effort; probably, we don't how long we supposed to wait to get the flying planes. If the scientists didn't invent the computer then how hard would be life compared to now. So many achievement in the field of medicine and healthcare for the cure of so many harmful diseases wouldn't be possible without the delicacy of scientists in the field of invention. Now people are searching life in the outer planets; i don't think we will positive result accidentally, instead of that, scientists have to work more deeply and with great zealot.
Some people argue that; Newton discovered gravitational force accidentally, when an apple fell over his head. But they never talk about his dedication and hard work to derive the relation between gravitational force and mass. His intellectual mind and curious mind played the vital role for all of his discoveries.
In sum, we can say that most of the discoveries requires the curious mind and hard work without giving up for the scientific discoveries.
- In a study of the reading habits of Waymarsh citizens conducted by the University of Waymarsh, most respondents said they preferred literary classics as reading material. However, a second study conducted by the same researchers fo 50
- Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated. 50
- Many important discoveries or creations are accidental: it is usually while seeking the answer to one question that we come across the answer to another. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 12, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
The writer have the assertion that many important disco...
^^^^
Line 1, column 147, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...sult of unanticipated outcome. However, i disagree with that statement. Researche...
^
Line 1, column 446, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
... accidental process then, probably they wouldnt have to work so hard and with such devo...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 447, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...mous art of 'Monalisa', which didnt happened accidentally. There are much m...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 560, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...at scientific discoveries and creations cant happen accidentally. Moreover, scientis...
^^^^
Line 5, column 20, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
... such discovery. If Wright brothers wouldnt have work with such dedication and effo...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 84, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...uch dedication and effort; probably, we dont how long we supposed to wait to get the...
^^^^
Line 5, column 162, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...et the flying planes. If the scientists didnt invent the computer then how hard would...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 236, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun achievement seems to be countable; consider using: 'many achievements'.
Suggestion: many achievements
... hard would be life compared to now. So many achievement in the field of medicine and healthcare...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 334, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...or the cure of so many harmful diseases wouldnt be possible without the delicacy of sci...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 470, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... searching life in the outer planets; i dont think we will positive result accidenta...
^^^^
Line 9, column 139, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ving up for the scientific discoveries.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, then, while, for example, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1901.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 369.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15176151762 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85191179744 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517615176152 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0221526195 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.611111111 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.94444444444 5.21951772744 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 7.80617977528 154% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103322579205 0.243740707755 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0352417263283 0.0831039109588 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492148681125 0.0758088955206 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.059143827166 0.150359130593 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0337596059862 0.0667264976115 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.