"Many of the world's lesser-known languages are being lost as fewer and fewer people speak
them. The governments of countries in which these languages are spoken should act to
prevent such languages from becoming extinct."
Language is a major media of communication also by using language people can exchange their expression. Exsitance of a language depends on how many people are using them. The author claims in the statement that if people less talk in the inherent languages then these languages will not exist. However, I agree with the author statement.
Firstly, in our world, there are more than 1000 of language. Some of them are not so popular as English, French, Spanish etc. Some of the languages are spoken by tribal people which is very rare language and not well known. Since these languages have no written alphabet and one day these type of language will not exist. Moreover, many of the tribal languages have no practice in primary level. If the government takes the step to preserve inherent language and make sure that tribal people are practising their language then there is hope.
Secondly, today's world is more competitive and every people should learn a language that is widely used. So, some people are not interested in their traditional language. For instance, India has more than 26 different languages and almost every state has a different mother tongue. But, today young generation is indifferent to their language and try to learn English. Because, English is now using in every sector like office, academic book, or different multinational company. As a result, they are less using their mother language and if this situation continues one-day less-known language will be not extant.
However, Japan is a small country and with very small population but still, there is no decline the number of population of using their language. They preserve their language and also make deal with other county with thair language. They study their language in school level which is one of the main cause for preservation of the language.
To conclude, every issue has pros and cons and we must be careful of regarding such thing. No matter how much better anyone try to introduce their always something behind it. To preserve the language we need to increase the awareness among the people and make sure to implement a good practice of the language.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-07-29 | Seema Modak | 50 | view |
- A recent study by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention found that employees with paid sick leave are 28% less likely to be involved in a work-related accident than employees that do not receive payment for the sick leave. Researchers hypothesize 50
- Animal fossils 3
- The fact that technology is outpacing the needs of those in cultures that can afford the technologycreates cultures of excess consumerism. 16
- tpo 32sounds "quackers" (from the Russian word for frog sounds). The sources of the sound seemed to be moving with great speed and agility;however, the submarines' sonar (a method of detecting objects underwater) was unable to detect any so 73
- People should question the rules of authority as opposed to accepting them passively. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 127, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...opular as English, French, Spanish etc. Some of the languages are spoken by tribal people w...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 543, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sing their language then there is hope. Secondly, todays world is more competiti...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 125, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'anyone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'tries'.
Suggestion: tries
...thing. No matter how much better anyone try to introduce their always something beh...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, still, then, well, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1803.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 360.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00833333333 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51902483337 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502777777778 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.7501023749 60.3974514979 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.9545454545 118.986275619 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3636363636 23.4991977007 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77272727273 5.21951772744 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303831388065 0.243740707755 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102106236237 0.0831039109588 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0821013767606 0.0758088955206 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180568455867 0.150359130593 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0861685813681 0.0667264976115 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 14.1392134831 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.11 8.38706741573 85% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 100.480337079 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.8971910112 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.