Mass media and the internet have caused people’s attention spans to get shorter. However, the overall effect has been positive: while people are less able to focus on one thing, they more than make up for it with an enhanced ability to sort through large quantities of information and find what’s important.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The author posits, with the widespread of the internet and mass media people are able to get surfeit of information, which give flexibility to the people to sort through the large quantities of information and find their penchant towards an particular information in which they are interested.
Nowadays, mass media and the internet shows important news and information in short, subsequently shorting people’s attention span. Also, this helps a large pool of information rather than just focusing on the one and showing that information in a again and again. This help in imbibing a large quantities of information and finding out what is prevalent.
In addition, with the busy and fast moving lifestyle people don't have much time to sit and watch what is going around in world. This problem has solved by the help of internet. As with the advancement in the technology, people are able to get access of things more easily. Let's take an example, if someone is interested in cricket and want to know the score of cricket match, but he or she don't have time to sit and watch the full match, he or she have full plaudits to check the check score on internet whenever he or she is free from his or her job. So, internet give people more flexibility to sort through large quantities of information and find what’s important for him or her.
lnshort, an app which gives information and news in short, is a very good example of this advancement. Getting information in short helps us imbibe more information and it is not like that we are not getting the clear picture what is going on, if we want we always have flexibility to go to the internet and find out more about that topic.
In sum, it is rational to say that mass media and internet have help us in enhancing our ability to find what is important through a large pool of information. They have definitely made our life much easier and helped us not to focus more on one thing. The author's conclusion that the overall effect has been positive seems plausible.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-12-17 | srujanakeerthi | 66 | view |
2019-12-17 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
2019-12-17 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
2019-12-15 | Chayank_11 | 33 | view |
2019-12-05 | Opak Pulu | 50 | view |
- Mass media and the internet have caused people’s attention spans to get shorter. However, the overall effect has been positive: while people are less able to focus on one thing, they more than make up for it with an enhanced ability to sort through lar 50
- Following the September 11th attack, where the Al-Queda acquired bombmaking and terrorist knowledge over the internet, many lawmakers have proposed that an international body regulate the internet so that sites which provide information to terrorists coul 50
- “The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household.”Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you 37
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company.“According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in a 50
- People's behaviour is largely determined by forces not of their own making.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supportin 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 239, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...rmation and find their penchant towards an particular information in which they ar...
^^
Line 3, column 252, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...the one and showing that information in a again and again. This help in imbibing ...
^
Line 3, column 301, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'quantity'?
Suggestion: quantity
...nd again. This help in imbibing a large quantities of information and finding out what is ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 61, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...e busy and fast moving lifestyle people dont have much time to sit and watch what is...
^^^^
Line 5, column 274, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...le to get access of things more easily. Lets take an example, if someone is interest...
^^^^
Line 5, column 391, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...e score of cricket match, but he or she dont have time to sit and watch the full mat...
^^^^
Line 5, column 449, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...sit and watch the full match, he or she have full plaudits to check the check score ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Lnshort
...hat's important for him or her. lnshort, an app which gives information and new...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 258, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
... us not to focus more on one thing. The authors conclusion that the overall effect has ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, in addition, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 12.4196629213 0% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1680.0 2235.4752809 75% => OK
No of words: 355.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7323943662 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68448487347 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 215.323595506 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.464788732394 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 522.0 704.065955056 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.8969287755 60.3974514979 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3571428571 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.85714285714 5.21951772744 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304387028081 0.243740707755 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112791664662 0.0831039109588 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0747796427739 0.0758088955206 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174162297421 0.150359130593 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0605384496938 0.0667264976115 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 100.480337079 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.