The statement that men and women are not equally suited for many tasks is misleading and doesn't hold in this modern age. In the older days, the physical differences between men and women were blatant. The reason behind such discrepancy was the role assigned to each gender- men have been held responsible for fetching resources for the family and the women have been seen as the caretaker and homemaker. Such distinction of roles holds minimal credence in the 21st century.
Strength is one quality which is attributed to men, and hence the heavy load works are expected to be done better by men. But with proper training and diet, strength can be achieved by any gender with no exception. There are numerous examples of female weightlifters and athletes, defying the myth that men are only capable of doing laborious tasks. Other fields where men have hegemony is science and research. From Madam Curie to Kalpana Chawla there are myriad cases where this myth is busted. Women are also proven victorious in politics. Their involvement in politics is growing rapidly. Indira Gandhi was one of the most successful and feted prime minister of India, which proves that women hold the mental strength and shows no physical difference from men in that context.
The proposed statement is unacceptable in the converse sense also. Empathy and care are the attributes related to women more closely than men. But we can see multiple examples violating this claim. This is also of common knowledge that there are more male chefs than women. Beauty and design are some fields where women are expected to outshine men, but there are many illustrious men in the fashion industry which proves that men can be aesthets too.
Since the ancient boundary between the roles of men and women is getting thinner day by day as we are moving towards the modern and open society, saying that both genders can't perform some tasks equally is orthodox.
- Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to add 50
- Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well-being of the societies and environments in which they operate. Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations, provided they operate withi 16
- "Manned space flight is costly and dangerous. Moreover, the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks associated with sending men 50
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the owner of Movies Galore, a chain of movie-rental stores."Because of declining profits, we must reduce operating expenses at Movies Galore's ten movie-rental stores. Raising prices is n 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 335, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... such operations as effectively as men. Hence we can clearly see women working hard a...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, so, still, well, as to, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1296.0 2235.4752809 58% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 268.0 442.535393258 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83582089552 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67141248078 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 215.323595506 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563432835821 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 704.065955056 57% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0090693809 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6923076923 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6153846154 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.69230769231 5.21951772744 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0950655214419 0.243740707755 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0417500606826 0.0831039109588 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489593192329 0.0758088955206 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0686598356781 0.150359130593 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0255584983455 0.0667264976115 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 100.480337079 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.