Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to add

Essay topics:

Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.

The problem of this kind of a statement is that its often turns out to be biologically determined but negeting the physical difference is turning away from reality.The inherent physical difference between male and female are obvious but that does not necessarily mean that they are absolutely unsuited for similar task. The issue has certain nuances which should be dealt more metaculously than just as a passing comment.

If we take the biological determinism seriously the question that needs to be asked- is the workplace planned keeping mind a male worker or a female worker. The answer is often obvious from the design of workplace to the company policies all are planned with a male worker in mind, untill recently. So the outcome of glossing over the physical differences between the two gender just as a means to oppose the biological determinism has had its problem. Though there was an opposition and rightly so, but that did not change the reality of women being excluded from work. More recent changes in the work culture- both structural and policy-wise changes has enabled women to work in same spaces with men.

Though, the prejudices are prevalent, often a female worker getting success is compared moral degradation or due to their sycophantism. This type of lewd comments show the nature of the work place the insecurities of a patriarchal setup. By emphacizing on patriarchy, it is implied that this kind of behaviour is not gendered. Often women vilify their fellow female employee in similar tone. Such prejudice on the long run proves to be difficult for the collective as it give more power to the already dominant gender. Thus, in IT industry its quite a prevalant bias that female workers cannot do innovative work, though those are just ways to make the space inimical for the female workers, who are already less in number.

As we see how biological determinism and prejudices are still prevalent. We see, especially in chemical industries in India female workers are not taken as chemical are supposedly more harmful for women. Though this idea reeks of biological determinism but absolute negetion of a scientific claim, atleast the way it is mentioned on the bottles of reagent, need serious research. This sort of murky grounds exists. Then smae was said for women worker in textile industry but since outsourcing of the textle industry from the firts world nations, the majority of the labour force from India, China and Combodia are women. Though this women severe health problems but they are still sort for as they provide cheap labour. So when cheap labour can be extrated the logic of physical difference and suitability for a certain task gets sidelined.

Mainly, there are difference between the innate physical attributes of male or female but to make that a deterministic factor for exclusion or exploitation is problematic.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-03 Sumaiya Mila 75 view
2019-11-16 trance 66 view
2019-11-03 Raunaq 50 view
2019-10-23 Ankita_Rath 62 view
2019-10-08 borahlohit05@gmail.com 54 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user mmpakashb :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 21, Rule ID: KIND_OF_A[1]
Message: Don't include 'a' after a classification term. Use simply 'kind of'.
Suggestion: kind of
The problem of this kind of a statement is that its often turns out t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 165, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...difference is turning away from reality.The inherent physical difference between ma...
^^^
Line 1, column 321, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...e absolutely unsuited for similar task. The issue has certain nuances which should ...
^^^
Line 5, column 541, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...y dominant gender. Thus, in IT industry its quite a prevalant bias that female work...
^^^
Line 5, column 709, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: less
...for the female workers, who are already less in number. As we see how biological determinis...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 629, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...a, China and Combodia are women. Though this women severe health problems but they a...
^^^^
Line 7, column 682, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'sorted'.
Suggestion: sorted
...vere health problems but they are still sort for as they provide cheap labour. So wh...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, still, then, thus, kind of, sort of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2405.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 475.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06315789474 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66845742379 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72133745837 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 215.323595506 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526315789474 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 768.6 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.9528809887 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.523809524 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.619047619 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.28571428571 5.21951772744 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 10.2758426966 19% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116946299922 0.243740707755 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.035224039379 0.0831039109588 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0243980885944 0.0758088955206 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0689671198533 0.150359130593 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0202505460258 0.0667264976115 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 100.480337079 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.