Money spent on research is almost always a good investment, even when the
results of that research are controversial
I agree with the speaker's assertion that the money spent on research is money generally well invested. However, the speaker unnecessarily extends this assertion that the results of the research can be controversial to embrace the controversial part of the research. My points of contention with the speaker includes the fundamental objective and nature of research as discussed below:
I accept the fact that the speaker says that "money spent on research is always a good investment" as research is nothing but an exploration of the new things in ourselves or the world where we live in. There is always a curiosity to get to know the unknown facts and satisfy ourselves by researching them without presuming the controversies related to its research.
While we must invest in research irrespective of the controversies which we get while the research is done. After all, expensive research carries a significant cost- in terms of how the money could be spent on addressing society's problems which do not require research.
In conclusion, I would like to say that I agree with the fact when the speaker says that the money spent on research is money well-financed because it is an investment for the advancement of human knowledge and human imagination and spirit.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 18, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'speakers'' or 'speaker's'?
Suggestion: speakers'; speaker's
I agree with the speakers assertion that the money spent on resea...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...roversies related to its research. While we must invest in research irrespective...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, well, while, after all, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 58.6224719101 51% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1082.0 2235.4752809 48% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 209.0 442.535393258 47% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17703349282 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 4.55969084622 83% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10522998191 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 215.323595506 52% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540669856459 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 323.1 704.065955056 46% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 20.2370786517 35% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.8812175948 60.3974514979 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.571428571 118.986275619 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8571428571 23.4991977007 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 5.21951772744 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.426475667768 0.243740707755 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.218373295156 0.0831039109588 263% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0277138588154 0.0758088955206 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.263331950455 0.150359130593 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562147546413 0.0667264976115 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 14.1392134831 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.36 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 100.480337079 47% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.