Education is the biggest asset of a nation and students are the most valuable currency. Schools are the building blocks of a nation's future where students take their first step towards building a better country. Any laws changing the way these building blocks work should be contemplated and analyzed thoroughly before being implemented. Mandating all schools to teach the same national curriculum to the students until they reach college will be a grave mistake if implemented. It will not only affect the students, but it will also affect the whole country in the long run.
A nation is a huge place. It has several states and numerous localities. A huge number of communities exist in a country, especially when a country is large and open to diversity. Different areas have different languages, several dialects, and their own traditions. It becomes difficult for the students to give up their local knowledge and start learning everything from scratch. It will hamper with their goals and put more stress in their education.
Local languages and traditions are an immeasurable wealth of a nation. These are passed on to the next generations through early education, particularly in schools. A nation should promote its diversity, instead of quenching it. Requiring the students to learn from a standard nation-wide curriculum will lead to lost heritage. There will be no one knowing their mother tongue and their traditions will be long forgotten. This will come up as a huge loss for the nation and its people.
A law similar to the claim was passed in India in 1963, mandating all mid schools to follow a national curriculum strictly. Initially, it resulted in a stellar economic growth in 15 years, but by the 1990s the local culture and traditions started getting forgotten. Local languages were replaced by Hindi. Such a loss was too great for the nation and the law was reverted in 1995, which thankfully restored the diversity throughout the country.
It is true that a national standard for education must be set throughout a country, but mandating it will have hugely detrimental effects in the future. It should be optional for the schools to follow the curriculum, as it will be the students and their parents' decision to choose their education path.
- The council of Maple County, concerned about the county's becoming overdeveloped, is debating a proposed measure that would prevent the development of existing farmland in the county. But the council is also concerned that such a restriction, by limiting 55
- In 1992 many farmers in Jalikistan began using a hormone designed to produce larger cows that would produce more milk Since then childhood obesity in Jalikistan has grown by 200 percent The amount of milk and dairy consumed by children in this area has no 83
- According to a recent report by our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies act 42
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
- Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, as to, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1903.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 376.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06117021277 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77568741766 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526595744681 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 574.2 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.4115421253 60.3974514979 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.7391304348 118.986275619 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.347826087 23.4991977007 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.86956521739 5.21951772744 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272430436502 0.243740707755 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0840033974563 0.0831039109588 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0942180034105 0.0758088955206 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150559160093 0.150359130593 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0795956227257 0.0667264976115 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 14.1392134831 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 48.8420337079 130% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.