A nation has individuals arising from various backgrounds. No two children are brought up in the same way by their parents. Each school student has his or her own potential and exposing all students to the same exact environment would not enable the students to completely unlock their true hidden potential.
This is why I take a stance against the statement, saying that a nation should not have a single national curriculum for all students until they enter college.
Assume that a national curriculum has been established and all students study the same syllabus. As an example, Student A may find the syllabus very easy and it may not pose a challenge to him. Student B on the other hand may find it very difficult to cope up with the curriculum and may require monumental effort to score a passing grade. The national curriculum thus falters here. Student A will not put in much effort and therefore his true potential may not be exposed. He may remain average for the rest of this school life. He would not know what a challenge is because of the ease of the curriculum. Taking the next step towards college would be a difficult task for student A because of unexpected challenges. Student A would not know how to respond to failure and may get highly demotivated during his college life.
Student B on the other hand has been meeting with only failures during his school life. At some point student B might get completey discouraged and neglect his studies. This is because of the fact that he has been experiencing only failures throughout his school life and he would be devastated to even think about stepping into college.
The key point to take away from this example is that students should be exposed to an environment where they meet success and failure. It is like boiling an egg; the egg should be heated gradually so that it gets cooked uniformly to perfection. Putting an egg into a pot of boiling water will make it crack and thus ruins the whole egg and the pot.
The students need to be exposed to varying difficulties of various curriculums, starting from the easiest and gradually progressing in difficulty. Student A might find the lower levels very easy and thus he may progess to higher levels very quickly and once he finds something challenging, he will begin to meet failure and know how to tackle failure, thus preparing him for the long and tough journey through a college. Student B on the other hand might find the lower levels difficult. He will also meet failure but, he will not get discouraged. He will also progress, but at a slower pace and meet Student A at the finish line.
This is why different curriculums should be implemented in a nation. Various students can enroll themselves in the curriculum of their choice and progress from there. This will create a nation of highly motivated individuals in the future. Individuals who know how to cope up with failure and how to succeed in life.
Students can choose their curriculum by taking mock tests conducted by dedicated organisations so that they can study the perfect curriculum at the first try and not choose a curriculum by trial and error. Of course, parents know their childern better than anyone. They can make informed decisions on behalf of their children.
In conclusion, my stance on the statement is that a nation should not implement a common national curriculum for students until they enter college. Various curriculums in a nation will benefit the students and provide a stepping stone for a bright future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 178, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
...uraged and neglect his studies. This is because of the fact that he has been experiencing only failures ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 14, column 155, Rule ID: TRY_AND[1]
Message: "Try and" is common in colloquial speech, but "'try to'" is recommended for writing.
Suggestion: try to
...udy the perfect curriculum at the first try and not choose a curriculum by trial and er...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, therefore, thus, in conclusion, of course, in the same way, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 34.0 12.4196629213 274% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 51.0 33.0505617978 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2933.0 2235.4752809 131% => OK
No of words: 609.0 442.535393258 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81609195402 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.96768813016 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6488185499 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 215.323595506 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.423645320197 0.4932671777 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 896.4 704.065955056 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 33.0 20.2370786517 163% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.6930153637 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.8787878788 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4545454545 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.27272727273 5.21951772744 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 9.0 4.97078651685 181% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216024786559 0.243740707755 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0683974927776 0.0831039109588 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0776364937944 0.0758088955206 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130404235428 0.150359130593 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0963469451049 0.0667264976115 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 100.480337079 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.