a nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum before college; write a response discussing the extent to which you agree or disagree with this statement and provide reasoning for which position you picked.
I strongly agree with the recommendation that a country should have a set base of curriculum requirements that all students should study prior to entering university. Prior to attending college in pursuit of post-secondary education, it is crucial that all students are held to the same standards and have a basic understanding of fundamental subjects. Upholding a national curriculum that is applied to all students before they enter college ensures that all students come in with a general knowledge of the same topics, and establishes a common baseline to build on.
An example that supports this position is the importance of having the knowledge of what students coming in to college courses have learned in their past educational careers in order to set up the college course curriculums themselves. Without a required general curriculum that all students should follow before entering university, it would be an extreme challenge for professors to teach an entire class of students without having the knowledge of what each individual has been exposed to prior to taking a certain course. A national curriculum applied to students before they attend university allows for college courses to be organized and set up in a way that focuses on further developing the students' knowledge of that particular subject, a task that would otherwise be incredibly difficult to do without an established baseline of what the students have been exposed to in their past education.
A second example that supports this position is the fact that college learning is not solely based on developing knowledge in a certain subject, but also learning how to work in a group setting and collaborate on the topics at hand. A national curriculum applied to students prior to their college career allows for all individuals to enter with a common basic understanding of the subjects covered prior to entering university where individuals are expected to expand their knowledge on such subjects, often by working with one another. College students engaging in collaborative group work and learning among their peers without having a common core of knowledge would be much less successful without a national curriculum prior to university.
A set of national requirements in a nation prior to college education promises a prosperous and beneficial setting for college students to come together and collaborate in order to further their knowledge in a certain subject, along with allowing colleges and the professors to format courses in a way that is accessible to all incoming students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 701, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
... that focuses on further developing the students knowledge of that particular subject, a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 234, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... and collaborate on the topics at hand. A national curriculum applied to students...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 79.0 58.6224719101 135% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2167.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 411.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27250608273 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99052400414 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.406326034063 0.4932671777 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 693.0 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.2370786517 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 41.0 23.0359550562 178% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.6126114186 60.3974514979 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 216.7 118.986275619 182% => OK
Words per sentence: 41.1 23.4991977007 175% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.21951772744 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203740088603 0.243740707755 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110321850415 0.0831039109588 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543739202503 0.0758088955206 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153667393189 0.150359130593 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05077079311 0.0667264976115 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.9 14.1392134831 169% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.4 48.8420337079 44% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.5 12.1743820225 168% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.17 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.4 11.2143820225 164% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.