Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Once nature is destroyed, recovery of its state to the original is almost impossible and even just to a certain level requires high cost and long span. In this point of view, putting importance on the preservation of its natural state, the given policy might have been suggested. Although it does make sense, preserving all the remaining intact areas is an over-strict policy without serious considerations of its negative influences on the economy.
Firstly, unable to develop wilderness areas indicates that there are no more additional fields for further development. One might argue that further necessary facilities such as department stores or gyms can be built in the areas where development has been already conducted, in other words, where wilderness is already harmed. However, it might be impossible for huge constructions such as airports or research centers. Those certain facilities require vast areas without other tall buildings around the place – developing wilderness areas is inevitable. Since their expected economic values are tantamount, it will be unsound to forgo to build those facilities to any nations. Therefore, the strict policy to ban further development of wild areas is hardly hold water.
Secondly, it is an inapplicable policy to developing countries as they inevitably need to develop their wilderness areas for economic growth. While developed countries already equipped with the necessary facilities such as international airports, some developing countries do not. The restriction of developing wild areas to those developing countries will prevent them from achieving an economic transition to the next step. As a result, the policy will worsen the inequity among the countries. For the possible malign effects to their economy, the policy will not be able to obtain legitimacy from those countries.
Preservation of nature is one of the most important values to human beings. However, the restriction in developing wilderness is the lack of consideration of what the policy will result in the countries’ further development and how it will worsen the economic inequity among countries. Therefore, the suggested policy will not be able to obtain a full acceptance from nations.
- The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds 66
- In any field of inquiry the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions 50
- Should schools monitor students online activities 60
- The following appeared as part of an article in a business magazine A recent study rating 300 male and female Mentian advertising executives according to the average number of hours they sleep per night showed an association between the amount of sleep th 74
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants Recently butter has been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States This change however has had little impact 58
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 4 2
No. of Sentences: 17 15
No. of Words: 343 350
No. of Characters: 1836 1500
No. of Different Words: 176 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.304 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.353 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.875 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 140 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 110 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 82 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 64 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.176 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.983 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.529 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.338 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.537 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.094 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5