Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Nature is the most beautiful creation on earth. Peaceful nation contains natural state of wild at its best. I strongly agree that wilderness areas should not be used for economic gain. The following examples state the reasoning for this point.
Disturbing the forests which contain natural wilder species and plants will only lead to global warming. Last month, Amazon forest in Columbia which is the largest rainforest on the earth and is home of many wild animals and plants is on fire for serveral days. The reason for this is deforestation and mining of forest lands for economic purpose. But in the end, the loss of forest caused more truble than the benefits of mining the forests. According to research conducted by scientists, it is confirmed that desforestation will cause lack of rainfall and also consumption of carbon dioxide will be reduced which will lead to global warming. Thus, Nation should pass the laws which will preserve the forests or wilderness areas in their natural state.
In todays world of technology, anything artifical can be created in a limited time. But, creation of wilderness or forests will take decades of years. The natural formation of wild or forest had happened million years ago. Destroying such natural formation is not the best idea. Economy can be gained in other lot of ways. Thus, reshaping the natural wilderness area should be prohibited strictly by Nation laws.
Some might argue that economy is base for growth as it provides money which can be used for food and shelter whereas wilderness is of no importance to the humans. But the food is indirectly provided by nature through grains. And shelter is provided by nature, through adequate rains so that we can live without harms of intense sunrays. Thus economy is created by humans for our way of living but nature is the means of living. Hence, Nations should strictly pass laws for the preservation of wilderness areas.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-18 | wenki31 | 58 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | Sumaiya Mila | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | Md. Kawsar Ahmed | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-14 | chapagain08 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | KarinaShine | 83 | view |
- "Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks. " 50
- Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks. 16
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company.“According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in a 43
- "Manned space flight is costly and dangerous. Moreover, the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks associated with sendin 37
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 205, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...ormation of wild or forest had happened million years ago. Destroying such natural form...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 338, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... live without harms of intense sunrays. Thus economy is created by humans for our wa...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 33.0505617978 39% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1617.0 2235.4752809 72% => OK
No of words: 323.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00619195046 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51140274492 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541795665635 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 704.065955056 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.0538322583 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.0 118.986275619 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.380952381 23.4991977007 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.85714285714 5.21951772744 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317867192102 0.243740707755 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103439126286 0.0831039109588 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101170178538 0.0758088955206 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20733202998 0.150359130593 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0543315523937 0.0667264976115 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 14.1392134831 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 48.8420337079 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 12.1743820225 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 100.480337079 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.