Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Wilderness areas are the area where human activity is minimal and it is in the natural state. I agree with the author's point to pass laws to keep wilderness area in their natural form. since these are the areas which give us the true feeling to interact with nature in its nearest ideal form. But if it is utmost important for a nation to use them for their people safety then they can be used for economic gain as well. So it is important to take a look on pros and cons of using wilderness area from economic gain perspective.
First, nature always looks for balance and due to human intervention we are facing lots of natural disasters nowadays. Global warming is one of the dangers among them. Also, we are destroying many forests, which were habitats of many rare animals. Now, these animal are going extinct. Trees are cutting down to create buildings due to that balance of natural gases in nature is disturbing. So these natural calamities are the biggest drawbacks for a national health and safety perspective.
Furthermore, in the long-term perspective losing natural habitats is bad for economic perspective. since nature is the major source for providing food, shelter, and cloth. Also, the human who lives a very luxurious lifestyle looks for a natural place to visit. Everyone likes to live as close to nature as possible. Now everyone is looking towards to consume more organic food to keep healthy. It has been said, to keep healthy one should consume things in its natural form. So above perspective shows that it is very important to save wilderness areas for our own long-term benefits.
However, If there is an area which is not used in any form then it can be developed using human intervention so that the nation can use it for their economic gain. The most important thing to keep in mind is that there should be a balance between artificially created things and natural things. If we cutting down a forest then all their animals must be transferred to another place so rare animal are not extinct. Also, we should plant double the no of trees as we cut one. Our final goal should be to get economic gain without compromising natural balance. We can change its style or beauty but should not affect its process.
So overall, after going through all pros and cons, it can be understood that human intervention for economic gain is good if we are not destroying the balance of nature's process while getting economic gain. But health, food, a shelter can be best achieved
if things are in its natural forms. Also, a natural calamity like global warming can be avoided for long if we do very little intervention in the wilderness area. So the idea of passing laws to preserve wilderness area seems fit for a nation's perspective.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-18 | wenki31 | 58 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | Sumaiya Mila | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | Md. Kawsar Ahmed | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-14 | chapagain08 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | KarinaShine | 83 | view |
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station."Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this time period, most of the comp 77
- According to a new report from the federal government, overall donations of money to nonprofit groups increased last year. Most notably, donations to international aid groups increased by 30 percent, followed by donations to environmental groups, which in 37
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position 50
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr. Karp, an anthropologist."Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rat 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 186, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Since
... wilderness area in their natural form. since these are the areas which give us the t...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 186, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... wilderness area in their natural form. since these are the areas which give us the t...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 100, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Since
...bitats is bad for economic perspective. since nature is the major source for providin...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 296, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ally created things and natural things. If we cutting down a forest then all their...
^^
Line 7, column 449, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...tinct. Also, we should plant double the no of trees as we cut one. Our final goal ...
^^
Line 10, column 236, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...reserve wilderness area seems fit for a nations perspective.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, so, then, well, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 34.0 19.5258426966 174% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2281.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 481.0 442.535393258 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7422037422 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68313059816 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52969022701 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.455301455301 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 733.5 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.2235112823 60.3974514979 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.4642857143 118.986275619 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1785714286 23.4991977007 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.82142857143 5.21951772744 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 10.2758426966 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332022527621 0.243740707755 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0991151811586 0.0831039109588 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0714642738452 0.0758088955206 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20249918386 0.150359130593 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0787427109777 0.0667264976115 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 14.1392134831 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.11 8.38706741573 85% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 100.480337079 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.