No field of study can advance significantly unless it incorporates knowledge and experience from outside that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The assertion makes a valid point to certain extent, but it is too absolute and unconditional. I agree, that knowledge as well experience of other fields' holds importance in the study of certain fields. However, some domains might be self sufficient enough to advance without depending on other varied fields. Discipline like Mathematics started on its own feet and over the years has advanced without incorporating experiences from any other fields.
Consider the field of arts, where imagination plays a pivotal role rather than any theory or experience. Be it visual, auditory, or performing arts, all these fields have advanced on their own since their birth. In fact, no other domain can be amalgamated with art. One cannot apply the experiences of mathematics or politics in improving artistic activities.
On the other hand, field of science is significantly dependent on mathematics. Motion of the planets, interplanetary distances, speed of the heavenly bodies are all derived by using mathematical calculations. Even the field of physics has not been untouched by Mathematics. Faraday's law of electromagnetic induction, Einstein's theory of relativity, Newton's laws of motion are all incomplete without mathematical operations.
Politics is one other field, which capitalizes the knowledge of other domains like economics and statistics. To form economic policies of a nation, it is of utmost importance to have a mastery on economics. Statistics of employment, poverty, health issues are required for the leaders to determine the well being of the citizens and take concrete steps to improvise the basic necessities of people.
To sum up, I partially concord with the author's statement. Though, experiences and knowledge from different fields outside the study of a particular field, are necessary for the advancement in that field, but, as discussed the statement does not hold true for all the domains. There are certain fields like arts and philosophy that have gotten nothing to do with other areas and are totally dependent on self for the advancements.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-28 | FaylEAVE0920 | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-03 | wwwww | 66 | view |
| 2019-09-16 | Gh.Ne | 79 | view |
| 2019-09-08 | Pranjali Pathak | 50 | view |
| 2019-08-28 | Navis | 66 | view |
- It is more harmful to compromise one's own beliefs than to adhere to them.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting 50
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state. 16
- The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals 58
- The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree 62
- In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should be required to step down after five years. 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 371, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...nd take concrete steps to improvise the basic necessities of people. To sum up, I partially co...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 41, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...To sum up, I partially concord with the authors statement. Though, experiences and know...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'well', 'in fact', 'to sum up', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.265753424658 0.240241500013 111% => OK
Verbs: 0.139726027397 0.157235817809 89% => OK
Adjectives: 0.106849315068 0.0880659088768 121% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0356164383562 0.0497285424764 72% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0219178082192 0.0444667217837 49% => OK
Prepositions: 0.139726027397 0.12292977631 114% => OK
Participles: 0.041095890411 0.0406280797675 101% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.08611572577 2.79330140395 110% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0219178082192 0.030933414821 71% => OK
Particles: 0.0027397260274 0.0016655270985 164% => OK
Determiners: 0.0931506849315 0.0997080785238 93% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00821917808219 0.0249443105267 33% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00821917808219 0.0148568991511 55% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2076.0 2732.02544248 76% => OK
No of words: 324.0 452.878318584 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.40740740741 6.0361032391 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.58838876751 92% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.404320987654 0.366273622748 110% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.333333333333 0.280924506359 119% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.240740740741 0.200843997647 120% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.185185185185 0.132149295362 140% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08611572577 2.79330140395 110% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 219.290929204 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574074074074 0.48968727796 117% => OK
Word variations: 63.0573612496 55.4138127331 114% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6194690265 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.380412469 77% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3475114782 59.4972553346 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.333333333 141.124799967 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 23.380412469 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.444444444444 0.674092028746 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.21349557522 38% => OK
Readability: 51.3333333333 51.4728631049 100% => OK
Elegance: 2.26388888889 1.64882698954 137% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.411501981393 0.391690518653 105% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.100986964052 0.123202303941 82% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0427522686932 0.077325440228 55% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.538049221301 0.547984918172 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.114715632419 0.149214159877 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14747475708 0.161403998019 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.080722736836 0.0892212321368 90% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.294346201486 0.385218514788 76% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0827496675908 0.0692045440612 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252576019438 0.275328986314 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0727922523799 0.0653680567796 111% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.4325221239 105% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88274336283 82% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 7.22455752212 138% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.70907079646 148% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.5995575221 118% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.