In order to become well-rounded individuals, all college students should be required to take courses in which they read poetry, novels, mythology, and other types of imaginative literature.
Author claim “In order to become well-rounded individuals, all college students should be required to take courses in which they read poetry, novels, mythology, and other types of imaginative literature”, in my opinion would burden students to acquire lot of things at a time. As specified to become well-rounded individuals, students had acquire basic knowledge in schools thus enforcing them to study those courses in details might dissuade them to achieve success in field of their interest. Following are the reasons for my discordance towards author’s claim.
Firstly, In schools, students are inculcate with enough knowledge that allow them to discern or construe the world around them. Thus, providing in-depth the knowledge about imaginative literature would not be wise as students need to invest their time in such courses which doesn’t have any implication on their jobs. Students also faced problems while tackling with lots of courses specially science and engineering fields who are already imparted with other core subjects and have no link with these imaginative literature. Consider an example, A computer engineer who have profound knowledge about programming languages thus he/she would invest more time in learning such imaginative courses instead of spending time after his/her interest.
Secondly, Author claims might holds true as such imaginative literature improvise imaginative skills in individuals but here there are other core subjects like physics and chemistry which are sufficient enough to instill imaginative skills. In physics, students need to virtually understand the different forces acting on different state of objects same way in chemistry the bonds between various atoms, elements are conjured virtually. Thus, such subjects are plenary enough to make students imaginative. Many might argue about the knowledge poetry, novels, mythology, and other types of imaginative literature provides and partly such notion holds importance in one’s life but such knowledge are inculcated in students in schools only. where wide range of courses are provided like social studies, literature, science, etc. Thus, college students should be allowed to learn courses of their interest.
Thirdly, For students college is very important as in college they learn intricate and minute details about their field of study which prepares them for the corporate world. Thus, college should offer students their field of interest and dissuade them to study courses that will not contribute in their careers. In such case enforcing such imaginative literature would become onerate for students which have no importance on their career.
On wrapping up, Though, imaginative literature are important for a student but making it compulsory in college would hamper students in contribute their full in their field of interest and such courses one can acquire in spare time are college. Thus, Colleges should provided courses that in interest of students and make them ready for their jobs instead of enforcing them to study other courses of trivial influence in their field.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-23 | AAAA2222 | 79 | view |
| 2019-10-11 | kobiniloy74 | 58 | view |
| 2019-08-16 | Rida Rajani | 79 | view |
| 2019-08-13 | Lucybrian | 58 | view |
| 2019-07-21 | GREdestroyer | 66 | view |
- In this age of intensive media coverage, it is no longer possible for society to regard any living man or women as a hero 62
- In this age of intensive media coverage, it is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or women as a hero 66
- Teachers’ salaries should be based on the academic performance of their students 50
- The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things. 83
- In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 350, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'acquired'.
Suggestion: acquired
... well-rounded individuals, students had acquire basic knowledge in schools thus enforci...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 350, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'acquired'.
Suggestion: acquired
... well-rounded individuals, students had acquire basic knowledge in schools thus enforci...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 35, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'inculcated'.
Suggestion: inculcated
...m. Firstly, In schools, students are inculcate with enough knowledge that allow them t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 507, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun might seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much might', 'a good deal of might'.
Suggestion: Much might; A good deal of might
...ry enough to make students imaginative. Many might argue about the knowledge poetry, novel...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 744, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Where
...inculcated in students in schools only. where wide range of courses are provided like...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, third, thirdly, thus, well, while, of course, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2655.0 2235.4752809 119% => OK
No of words: 472.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.625 5.05705443957 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6610686524 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73413705258 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474576271186 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 826.2 704.065955056 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 6.24550561798 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.9220092415 60.3974514979 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.5 118.986275619 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2222222222 23.4991977007 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61111111111 5.21951772744 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357906235157 0.243740707755 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121763537521 0.0831039109588 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129474912496 0.0758088955206 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222982834216 0.150359130593 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124361845771 0.0667264976115 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 14.1392134831 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 48.8420337079 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.1743820225 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 12.1639044944 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.