Paleo diets in which one eats how early hominids human ancestors did are becoming increasingly popular Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food especially bone broth a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours They

The prompt states about the abrupt rise in the popularity of Paleo diets - which was earlier followed by hominids and a number of plausible reasons why the diet is salutary. The argument rests on a number of dubious assumptions and fails to provide lucid evidence to land on the unwarranted presumptions. The argument does not hold water for myriads of reasonable explanations.
Firstly, It is believed that the health-promoting nutrients such as cartilage can heal the joints of the human body and promote the regeneration of nerve tissues. There is no scientifically proven evidence for the aforementioned assumption. Indeed, there are doubtful contradictory arguments questioning the validity of the same. Recently, there have been another diet - know as keto - which gained much popularity among diverse age group and society. The diet is proven to be beneficial for a large fraction of people but there have been fatal incidents reported due to following the same diet. Even such a socially and scientifically accepted diet has caused deleterious effects on people. So it is not sagacious to conclude the positives of Paleo diets without scientific researches.
Paradoxical to the above counter-argument mentioned, it is stated in the prompt that there is strong evidence that people who consume bone broth have fewer metabolic and inflammatory diseases than those who don’t. But the source of the anecdotal conclusion is obscure. Is the data gleaned from a smaller fraction of people or a larger group? Is the source of this information credible? The questions hold a huge role in determining the validity of the statement. Metabolic and inflammatory diseases engender due to a number of factors, which involves hereditary factors, food habits, environmental conditions and so forth. The factors that contributed to such a finding are of ultimate significance in determining the validity of the statement.
Thirdly, it is assumed that ancient people had more idea about our physiology than the present generation and that by emulating the way they ate, we can cure many chronic illnesses. The claim is flawed in many ways. The advancement of technology and health science has divulged a greater knowledge about the human torso. There are specialised fields dealing specifically with the study of human diets and the effects of each. It is manifest that present modern people with highly advanced technology knows much more about the human physiology than the older generations.
It might also be noted that, the past generation mostly relied on food sources that are readily available to them. The hominids had treated access to the animals and bones. Also, in the current world where the increased use of antibiotics in animals posses a significant threat, meticulous effort has to be taken to make sure the quality of the meat. It is to the bones these antibiotics are usually injected. The increased exposure to antibiotics will lead to the resistance of the same in humans such that they develop immunity to it. It will have adverse effect.
Due to the many reasons the prompt fails to validate, it can be concluded that the claims posited need more clarity and evidences so as to be agreeable.

Votes
Average: 5.8 (2 votes)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 306, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...o land on the unwarranted presumptions. The argument does not hold water for myriad...
^^^
Line 6, column 131, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...posited need more clarity and evidences so as to be agreeable.
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, so, third, thirdly, as to, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2689.0 2235.4752809 120% => OK
No of words: 520.0 442.535393258 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17115384615 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77530192783 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96511529607 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 269.0 215.323595506 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517307692308 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 867.6 704.065955056 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.99550561798 220% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.8874522773 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.724137931 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9310344828 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.24137931034 5.21951772744 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161549876285 0.243740707755 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0363590134285 0.0831039109588 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0332549480344 0.0758088955206 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0717509073966 0.150359130593 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0332083926749 0.0667264976115 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 155.0 100.480337079 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 306, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...o land on the unwarranted presumptions. The argument does not hold water for myriad...
^^^
Line 6, column 131, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...posited need more clarity and evidences so as to be agreeable.
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, so, third, thirdly, as to, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2689.0 2235.4752809 120% => OK
No of words: 520.0 442.535393258 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17115384615 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77530192783 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96511529607 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 269.0 215.323595506 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517307692308 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 867.6 704.065955056 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.99550561798 220% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.8874522773 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.724137931 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9310344828 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.24137931034 5.21951772744 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161549876285 0.243740707755 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0363590134285 0.0831039109588 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0332549480344 0.0758088955206 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0717509073966 0.150359130593 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0332083926749 0.0667264976115 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 155.0 100.480337079 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.