"People are too quick to take action; instead they should stop to think of the possible consequences of what they might do."
A lot of people tend to act out of emotion rather than thinking before doing something. The prompt suggests that people should think for few seconds before doing something. In my opinion, I strongly agree with this recommendation because there is no point in doing something bad and regretting it later.
To begin, humans have a strong tendency towards their emotion. They like to do what their heart says than their mind. Heart always acts on emotions and humans will never even think for at least few seconds and they are quick to do something. For instance, a person took a decision which is very critical to his company. He thinks very carefully and he even discusses with his board members and comes to a conclusion. What if he just takes his action in no time? That leads to collapse of his business. So it is best to sort out all the things and take a wise decision which benefits everyone.
Further, people just take a person on whom they have respect, as an example and they will compare with their lives. They tend to imitate their actions in their lives too. So if there is any exacerbate situation, people are so quick in coming to a conclusion just because it was successful in someone’s life. But people should understand that both the lives are different. People should make mistakes. What is learning if we didn’t do any mistakes? People can only learn from their mistakes. But that doesn’t mean that just for the sake of risk they can do whatever they want. Humans have brain for some reason and they should use it. There are people who listen to their mind rather than their heart while taking important decisions and they have a higher percentage of becoming success.
The relation between humans is mostly based on how well they communicate. If a person is not in a good mood and he has the tendency to this anger on someone else. He might speak in a harsh tone with someone he is very close to. But the words he used are coming just out of frustration but not intentionally. This damages the bonding between the two people. Instead, if he takes his time and talks with a person in a pleasant tone leaving all the irritation behind. This not only saves the relationship but also makes it stronger. Research says that a lot of failed marriages are because of the anger they show on their partner just because they are upset with something. So it is good for humans to keep their emotions on control and think before speaking.
Of course, some argue that quick actions give good and fast results. However, that is not the case every time. There are very few cases where quick decisions have given fruitful results. If humans think before doing an act or taking a decision there are very few chances of failure rather than when taking quick actions. Think before you speak not only gives you good results but also maintains a healthy relationship between people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-02 | Krishna Prasad | 50 | view |
| 2019-02-02 | amar poosarla | 50 | view |
- "It is possible to pass laws that control or place limits on people's behavior, but legislation cannot reform human nature. Laws cannot change what is in people's hearts and minds." 50
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating and fishing) among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department devotes littl 82
- In 1992, many farmers in Jalikistan began using a hormone designed to produce larger cows that would produce more milk. Since then, childhood obesity in Jalikistan has grown by 200 percent. The amount of milk and dairy consumed by children in this area ha 33
- Claim: Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's major field of study.Reason: Acquiring knowledge of various academic disciplines is the best way to become truly educated.Write a response in which yo 58
- "In 1975 a wildlife census found that there were seven species of amphibians in Xanadu National Park, with abundant numbers of each species. However, in 2002 only four species of amphibians were observed in the park, and the numbers of each species w 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, so, well, while, at least, for instance, of course, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 33.0505617978 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2393.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 513.0 442.535393258 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66471734893 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75914943092 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41859040512 2.79657885939 86% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.454191033138 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 734.4 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 35.0 20.2370786517 173% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 23.0359550562 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.5279659897 60.3974514979 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 68.3714285714 118.986275619 57% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 14.6571428571 23.4991977007 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.77142857143 5.21951772744 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 5.13820224719 272% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28164144023 0.243740707755 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0706021121518 0.0831039109588 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571465798216 0.0758088955206 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157760609528 0.150359130593 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619184822233 0.0667264976115 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.8 14.1392134831 55% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 48.8420337079 152% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 12.1743820225 53% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.16 12.1639044944 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.92 8.38706741573 83% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.2143820225 68% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.