Technology is a boon or bane. This depends upon people to people. As those who are amid with technologies will always in favor whereas, those who are not introduced to technologies thinks that it is a bane. However, as per the survey, those who are addicted to technologies are less creative as compare to those who are less aware of technologies. As technologies addicted people use it even in minor difficulties which deteriorate there thinking capacity.
In today's world technologies has been introduced to a person since from his childhood. As a result, he starts using it in minor issues which limits its natural abilities like the power of intellect. For example, My friend's child was in 5th class when he was allowed to use a calculator. So for very basic calculation, he uses a calculator. As a result, in higher classes, he finds difficulty in solving basic maths questions which involve a few calculations. Moreover, if the level of question rises he sometimes gives up.
Technology not only absconds your mental strength but also limits your physical ability. Like the invention of the car is generally considered as a boon because it reduces our journey time up to a high extent. However, if we analyze its outcome so it is boon as well as a bane. This is because it has assuaged the advantages of riding a bicycle and walking. For example, in my childhood days, I use to ride a bicycle more than 5 to 8 kilometers. But, as soon as I was introduced to 2 or 4 wheeled vehicles so I, using it even for 1 km distance. As a result, I end up in gaining weight and my body has stored the high amount of fat. Fortunately, I become alert and stops using the motor vehicles for such a small distance.
Nowadays technology has mixed in our blood in such a manner that it creates a path for every situation and we all are following it blindly. Moreover, this endangered ours out of the box thinking. For example, my friend belongs to a very rich farmer family. He has acres of farming land in 2 to 3 nations. In order to pour fertilizers in the field, he uses an airplane. This cost him high capital. So, I asked him about an alternative solution so he replied that there is no alternative solution. We are precticizing this method since long ago. So, in replace of an airplane, they can higher labors and pour fertilizers manually. Which may prove as the cost-effective method.
So in a nutshell, "excess of anything is bad". Though technologies save your time up to the high extent. However, at the same time, it might restrain your mental as well as physical power.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 33, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...se who are less aware of technologies. As technologies addicted people use it eve...
^^
Line 9, column 163, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...g. For example, in my childhood days, I use to ride a bicycle more than 5 to 8 kilo...
^^^
Line 16, column 58, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... 'excess of anything is bad'. Though technologies save your time up to the h...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, whereas, for example, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.6327345309 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.9520958084 31% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 13.6137724551 88% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 28.8173652695 194% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 55.5748502994 97% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 16.3942115768 49% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2149.0 2260.96107784 95% => OK
No of words: 459.0 441.139720559 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68191721133 5.12650576532 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62863751936 4.56307096286 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87766989889 2.78398813304 103% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 204.123752495 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516339869281 0.468620217663 110% => OK
syllable_count: 696.6 705.55239521 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 21.0 4.96107784431 423% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 8.76447105788 0% => OK
Subordination: 11.0 2.70958083832 406% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.22255489022 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 32.0 19.7664670659 162% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.8473053892 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.1921808862 57.8364921388 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 67.15625 119.503703932 56% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 14.34375 23.324526521 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.9375 5.70786347227 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 13.0 5.15768463074 252% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.20758483034 183% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 6.88822355289 15% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 16.0 4.67664670659 342% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142805819833 0.218282227539 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.034386727263 0.0743258471296 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0381137464929 0.0701772020484 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0535947742204 0.128457276422 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329166841963 0.0628817314937 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.8 14.3799401198 54% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 48.3550499002 136% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 12.197005988 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.27 12.5979740519 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.32208582834 93% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 98.500998004 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 12.3882235529 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.1389221557 68% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.9071856287 67% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.