Human kinds are always seeking for making their life easier. In order to do so, many quantitative and qualitative jumps are made from Stone Age to well-equipped 21st century. Technology is developing and modifying day by day. Hence, the life of people becomes easier day by day. However, with advancing technology, most of the people are losing their critical thinking and reasoning by relying more and more on technology.
When I was in class five, I was able to do complex addition and multiplication problem by my mind. But now, I need a calculator or mobile apps to do simple addition and multiplication. Don’t you think that this is a degrading of my ability? Likewise, when there was no mobile phone, people used to remember all the necessary phone number in their mind. However, after the abundance of the mobile phone, people are saving all phone numbers in the digital contact list. They even do not know the phone number of their immediate relatives. If they lose their gadget, they lose everything.
The more rely on technology makes people lethargic. If we need any information, instead of thinking we take help with Google. If we need to buy anything instead of going to the supermarket, we simply do online shopping. Instead of visiting the family member, we do video chat. Even our office is in walking distance, we use a car to go. People want to avoid analog clock to see time. I think these representative examples are enough to explain how technology makes people lazy and degrading their ability.
It does not mean that we do not have to rely on technology. We should use it. Actually, technology is made for us to upgrade living standards. However, we also have to care about own ability. We should have to use technology as a medium, not as a principle. We have to be in access to technology but we don’t have to be dependent on technology.
By making a long story short, despite technology have many advantages in the modern era, if we cannot use it properly, it will deteriorate our ability to think.
- In any given field, the leading voices come from people who are motivated not by conviction but by the desire to present opinions and ideas that differ from those held by the majority. 50
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition 68
- "The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition." - Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or dis 66
- It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are generated and preserved.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developin 50
- "According to a recent report by our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies ac 29
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 591, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ose their gadget, they lose everything. The more rely on technology makes people...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, hence, however, if, likewise, so, well, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1691.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 354.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77683615819 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79758158099 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525423728814 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 23.0359550562 56% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.9968843787 60.3974514979 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 65.0384615385 118.986275619 55% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.6153846154 23.4991977007 58% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.61538461538 5.21951772744 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.83258426966 248% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192294215611 0.243740707755 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0563880721085 0.0831039109588 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0792482632338 0.0758088955206 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111084570744 0.150359130593 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0535606471611 0.0667264976115 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.9 14.1392134831 56% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 48.8420337079 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.85 12.1639044944 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 100.480337079 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 11.2143820225 64% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.