As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
There is no doubt that the 20th century is the era of technological revolution, but the question that is often posed is Does it really benefit humans or deteriorate their capabilities? Some would argue that technology is making us less social, lazy and less sharp. It is true that the impact of technology depends on how you use it but in my view the majority of use-cases of technology supplement the human tasks and not replace them. Since humans can do so many calculations we use technology to accelerate the solution process, augment our thoughts and not to deteriorate them. Even the so-called expert systems are termed as "Artificially" Intelligent systems since the systems cannot think on their own.
The use of technology in videography serves as a great example where technology augments human thoughts and creativity. With the advent of technology, creators have to still show their creative skills by writing story, making plot etc., it is just that they have technology as an additional tool for turning their imaginations into creations. And it is through an amalgam of creativity and clever use of technology that we are able to enjoy movies like Jurrasic Park. Technology enables creative individuals to express their views by means which were previously unavailable, the much rejoiced 3-d experience in movies is due to technological advancement for videos.
Another instance where technology supplements learning is smart classes wherein special visualizations are created to help the students in understanding the concepts better. The course structure for students is the same however, technology provides help in making it more interactive and interpretable content. Smart classes help teachers to track the students better by identifying the weaker topics, progress over time and so on.
In conclusion, technology is a tool to augment the human capabilities and not deteriorate them. Through the examples of videography and smart classes we discuss how technology supplements the creator's imagination and learning for students respectively. We should appreciate the myriad of possibilities technology creates for newer discoveries and avenues for human imagination.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | tarun9927 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | pranav_kanth | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | vivek2upad | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | sefeliz | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | jason123 | 54 | view |
- The city council of Town X has proposed reducing the city’s electric expenses by switching all the lights in public buildings from incandescent bulbs to light-emitting diodes (LEDs). The switch would be made gradually as the old incandescent bulbs burn 50
- Last year PrepUp had record enrollment in their test prep courses, but yearly profits fell by nearly 30percent. To the contrary, TopPreparation had comparable enrollment to the year be fore, with profits risingby approximately 20 percent. This discrepancy 69
- Company X has just switched to a 4-day workweek, mandating that employees work 10 hours per day fromMonday to Thursday instead of 8 hours per day from Monday to Friday. Although the policy is new,Company X claims that the policy will help to increase prof 50
- People should question the rules of authority as opposed to accepting them passively. 50
- Company X has just switched to a 4-day workweek, mandating that employees work 10 hours per day fromMonday to Thursday instead of 8 hours per day from Monday to Friday. Although the policy is new,Company X claims that the policy will help to increase prof 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 193, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'creators'' or 'creator's'?
Suggestion: creators'; creator's
... discuss how technology supplements the creators imagination and learning for students r...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, really, so, still, in conclusion, no doubt, in my view, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1867.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 340.0 442.535393258 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49117647059 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2495874106 2.79657885939 116% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2981977521 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.466666667 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.21951772744 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185737425259 0.243740707755 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688245680794 0.0831039109588 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0421243379189 0.0758088955206 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115268651322 0.150359130593 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0259050047798 0.0667264976115 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.1639044944 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.8971910112 134% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.